BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Allview Allwatch Hybrid S vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Allview Allwatch Hybrid S vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartwatches Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Allview

Allview Allwatch Hybrid S

Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
70/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
92/ 100
Launch MSRP$649 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) BETTER THAN Allview Allwatch Hybrid S?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAllview AllwatchSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity200 mAh590 mAh+590 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size1.22"1.5"1.5"
Chassis Weight88g605g88g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Allview Allwatch Hybrid S:
  • ✓517g lighter chassis (88g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓1.22" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm):
  • ✓$9350 lower launch MSRP ($649 vs $9999)
  • ✓Larger 590 mAh battery capacity (+390 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓1.5" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAllview Allwatch Hybrid SSamsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Smartwatches)
osProprietary OSWear OS 5 Powered by Samsung with One UI 6 Watch
socAllview mobile platform 2018—
ram gb1—
camerasNone—
displayLCD 1.22" (240x240 pixels) 278 PPI1.5-inch Super AMOLED (480x480, 327 PPI), Always-On Display, Sapphire Crystal Glass, up to 3000 nits peak outdoor brightness
weight g88—
dimensions—47.4 x 47.1 x 12.1 mm
battery mah200—
connectivity—Standalone 4G LTE cellular eSIM, Dual-frequency GPS (L1+L5), Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n 2.4+5GHz, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC Samsung Pay / Google Wallet
release date2018-12-01—
gps—Dual-frequency GPS (L1 + L5) for pinpoint trail and marathon tracking
ram—2GB RAM
weight—60.5 g (rugged titanium frame)
battery—590 mAh capacity (up to 100 hours in Power Saving mode, 48 hours Exercise Power Saving mode)
storage—32GB Internal Storage
charging—WPC-based wireless fast charging (10W)
materials—Aerospace-grade Grade 4 Titanium cushion frame with marine band
processor—Samsung Exynos W1000 (3nm, 5-core CPU: 1x Cortex-A78 + 4x Cortex-A55)
durability—10 ATM (100m ocean swim/dive) + IP68 + MIL-STD-810H certified, built-in 86dB emergency safety siren
health sensors—Samsung BioActive Sensor (Optical Heart Rate + Electrical Heart Signal ECG + Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis BIA), Temperature Sensor, Sleep Apnea, AGEs Index tracking
Launch MSRPPrice on request$649 USD
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Allview Allwatch Hybrid S:
Lighter body: 88g (517g lighter in hand)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm):
Higher overall BeastScore: 92.0 vs top rival 70.0 · Larger battery capacity: 590 mAh (+390 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Allview Allwatch Hybrid S vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Which is better: Allview Allwatch Hybrid S or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) leads with an overall BeastScore of 92.0/100 compared to Allview Allwatch Hybrid S (70.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 92.0 vs top rival 70.0 and Larger battery capacity: 590 mAh (+390 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Allview Allwatch Hybrid S and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

Allview Allwatch Hybrid S is equipped with a 1.22-inch display and 200 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) features a 1.5-inch display and 590 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Allview Allwatch Hybrid S and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Allview Allwatch Hybrid S achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) scores 94/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read Analysis →
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)Flagship Camera Shootout
14 min read

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)

An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.

Read Analysis →