BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) vs iPhone 14: Which One Should You Buy?
BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 67.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197)
iPhone 14
iPhone 14 wins 2 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeediPhone 146472
- CameraiPhone 146072
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryBBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197)8658
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 3,279 mAh
- BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) has the bigger screen6.51" vs 6.1"
- iPhone 14 is lighter172 g vs 193 g
- iPhone 14 has more RAM6 GB vs 4 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) wins — BeastScore 67.4/100
After comparing all the specs, BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 67.4 vs top rival 66.8 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,721 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 67.4 vs top rival 66.8 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,721 mAh more)
Significantly faster wired charging: 20W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 12 MP vs max 0 MP
Common questions
Which is better: BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) or iPhone 14?
BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) leads with an overall BeastScore of 67.4/100 compared to iPhone 14 (66.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 67.4 vs top rival 66.8 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,721 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) and iPhone 14?
BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) has a 6.51-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. iPhone 14 has a 6.1-inch display and 3279 mAh battery.
How do BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) and iPhone 14 compare for speed?
BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) scores 64/100 for performance; iPhone 14 scores 72/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-A166U Galaxy A16 5G 2024 Standard Edition TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-A166T (Samsung A166)
Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2411DRN47G (Xiaomi Flame Blaze)
BBK Vivo Y56 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB V2225 (BBK V2225)
Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
iPhone 14 vs iPhone 16
iPhone 14 vs iPhone 15
iPhone 13 vs iPhone 14
BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) vs Samsung SM-A166U Galaxy A16 5G 2024 Standard Edition TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-A166T (Samsung A166)
iPhone 14 vs Samsung SM-A166U Galaxy A16 5G 2024 Standard Edition TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-A166T (Samsung A166)
BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) vs Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)
iPhone 14 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
BBK iQOO U5e 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2197A (BBK V2197) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Related articles
All articles →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →
Flagship Projector ShootoutHisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.
Read →
Prosumer NAS Flagship ShootoutUGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)
We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.
Read →