BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) vs iPhone 16: Which One Should You Buy?
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) wins 2 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedBBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A)9080
- CameraiPhone 166082
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryBBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A)7858
- DisplayiPhone 166264
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) has the bigger battery4,700 mAh vs 3,561 mAh
- BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) has the bigger screen6.78" vs 6.1"
- iPhone 16 is lighter170 g vs 207 g
- BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
- iPhone 16 has the faster chipApple A18 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 5G SM8550-AB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) wins — BeastScore 72.3/100
After comparing all the specs, BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 71.7 and Larger battery capacity: 4,700 mAh (+1,139 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 71.7 · Larger battery capacity: 4,700 mAh (+1,139 mAh more)
Significantly faster wired charging: 20W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 48 MP vs max 0 MP
Common questions
Which is better: BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) or iPhone 16?
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.3/100 compared to iPhone 16 (71.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 71.7 and Larger battery capacity: 4,700 mAh (+1,139 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) and iPhone 16?
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) has a 6.78-inch display and 4700 mAh battery. iPhone 16 has a 6.1-inch display and 3561 mAh battery.
How do BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) and iPhone 16 compare for speed?
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) scores 90/100 for performance; iPhone 16 scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)

iPhone 15 Plus
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)

OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)

Xiaomi Mi 14 Civi 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 24053PY09I (Xiaomi Chenfeng)

BBK Vivo V27e 2023 NFC Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB V2237 (BBK V2237)

Oppo Reno10 Pro+ 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU V3 256GB CPH2521 (BBK 2521)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
iPhone 16 vs iPhone 17
iPhone 14 vs iPhone 16
iPhone 15 vs iPhone 16
iPhone 16 vs iPhone 16e
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs iPhone 16
iPhone 16 Pro vs iPhone 16
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) vs Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
iPhone 16 vs Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
Related articles
All articles →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →
Flagship Projector ShootoutHisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.
Read →
Prosumer NAS Flagship ShootoutUGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)
We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.
Read →