BeastCompare

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) vs iPhone 13 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2024

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
71/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Apple · 2021

iPhone 13 Pro

iPhone 13 Pro
71/ 100
Launch price$999
Head-to-head

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
3 wins
iPhone 13 Pro
iPhone 13 Pro
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)iPhone 13 Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedBBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
    80
    72
  • CameraiPhone 13 Pro
    60
    75
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryBBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
    86
    58
  • DisplayiPhone 13 Pro
    62
    86
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueBBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
    68
    55
Key differences
  • BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 3,095 mAh
  • BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) has the bigger screen6.67" vs 6.1"
  • BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) is lighter185.5 g vs 203 g
  • BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
  • iPhone 13 Pro has the faster chipApple A15 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 5G SM4450
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
  • ✓17.5 g lighter (185.5 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+1,905 mAh)
  • ✓6.67" display
Reasons to buy iPhone 13 Pro
  • ✓$9000 cheaper at launch ($999 vs $9999)
  • ✓12 MP main camera
  • ✓6.1" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationBBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)iPhone 13 Pro
1. Display & Screen🏆 iPhone 13 Pro Wins Display
Screen typeAM-OLED displaySuper Retina XDR OLED ProMotion
Screen Size6.67"6.1"
Resolution & Density1080x2400 (395 ppi)2532x1170 (460 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A1,000 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 5G SM4450 (4nm)Apple A15 Bionic (5nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsQualcomm Adreno 613Apple GPU (5-core)
Operating SystemAndroid iOS 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1024GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 iPhone 13 Pro Wins Camera
Primary CameraN/A12 MP, f/1.5, OIS
Telephoto ZoomNot listed12 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.8, OIS
Ultrawide CameraN/A12 MP, f/1.8
LiDAR / DepthNot listedNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/A12 MP, f/2.2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A146.7 x 71.5 x 7.7 mm
Weight185.5 g203 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh3,095 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A20W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed15W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 6
BluetoothNot listed5.0
USB Port & SpeedNot listedLightning
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$999
Our verdict

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) wins — BeastScore 71.4/100

After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 71.0 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,905 mAh more).

Buy BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 71.0 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,905 mAh more)

Buy iPhone 13 Pro if you want

Significantly faster wired charging: 20W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 12 MP vs max 0 MP

Common questions

Which is better: BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) or iPhone 13 Pro?

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to iPhone 13 Pro (71.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 71.0 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,905 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) and iPhone 13 Pro?

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. iPhone 13 Pro has a 6.1-inch display and 3095 mAh battery.

How do BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) and iPhone 13 Pro compare for speed?

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) scores 80/100 for performance; iPhone 13 Pro scores 72/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
Samsung

Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)

iPhone 16
Apple

iPhone 16

Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Google

Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

OnePlus Nord 3 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2491 (BBK Vitamin)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord 3 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2491 (BBK Vitamin)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)

BBK Vivo Y35+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2279A / Y35m+ (BBK V2279BA)
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y35+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2279A / Y35m+ (BBK V2279BA)

Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Oppo

Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

BBK Vivo Y56 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB V2225 (BBK V2225) vs BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)

Compare →
vs

BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) vs BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)

Compare →
vs

BBK Vivo Y100i 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2279A (BBK V2279A) vs BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)

Compare →
vs

iPhone 13 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro

Compare →
vs

iPhone 13 Pro vs iPhone 14 Pro

Compare →
vs

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)

Compare →
vs

iPhone 13 Pro vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)

Compare →
vs

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) vs iPhone 16

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →