BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) vs Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)
Lab Benchmark Battle

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) vs Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Vivo · 2024

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
69/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Xiaomi · 2022

Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)

Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)
69/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) BETTER THAN Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)Winner 🏆
Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORBBK VivoXiaomi PocoLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size6.56"6.43"6.56"
Chassis Weight185g178.8g178.8g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346):
  • ✓6.56" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary):
  • ✓6.199999999999989g lighter chassis (178.8g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓6.43" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationBBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)
1. Display & Screen🏆 BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) Wins Display
Screen Type & TechColor IPS TFT LCD displayAM-OLED display
Screen Size6.56"6.43"
Resolution & Density720x1612 (269 ppi)1080x2400 (409 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835T (6nm)MediaTek Helio G90T MT6785V/CC (12nm)
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsARM Mali-G57MP2ARM Mali-G76MC4
Operating SystemAndroid Android 12
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB128GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) Wins Camera
Primary CameraN/AN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/AN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight185 g178.8 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+5.0, A2DP, LE
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 69.4/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346):
Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
When to choose Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary):
Balanced specifications with Xiaomi hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) vs Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)

Which is better: BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) or Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) leads with an overall BeastScore of 69.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary) (69.4/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.

What are the primary battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) and Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) is equipped with a 6.56-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary) features a 6.43-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) and Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) achieves a 72/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary) scores 72/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
ExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?Hardware Pick
9 min read

ExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?

ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read Analysis →
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)Lab Tested · Monitor Architecture Showdown
18 min read

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)

We benchmarked the top 32-inch 4K 240Hz OLED gaming monitors across Gen 3 QD-OLED color volume, LG Micro Lens Array (MLA+) WOLED dual-mode 480Hz switching, sub-pixel text fringing, thermal dissipation heatsinks, DisplayPort 1.4 DSC vs HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, and 3-year burn-in warranties.

Read Analysis →