BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2022

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)
69/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Motorola · 2023

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
74/ 100
Launch price$999
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)
BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)
2 wins
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    72
    80
  • CameraMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    60
    72
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryBBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)
    86
    58
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    62
    96
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueBBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)
    68
    55
Key differences
  • BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.51"
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is lighter184.5 g vs 193 g
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+1,200 mAh)
  • ✓6.51" display
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • ✓8.5 g lighter (184.5 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$9000 cheaper at launch ($999 vs $9999)
  • ✓12 MP main camera

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationBBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeColor IPS TFT LCD displaypOLED
Screen Size6.51"6.9"
Resolution & Density720x1600 (270 ppi)2640x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz165 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A1,400 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7nm)Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsARM Mali-G57MP2Adreno 730
Operating SystemAndroid Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary CameraN/A12 MP, f/1.7, OIS
Telephoto ZoomNot listedNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A13 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNot listedNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/A32 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A170.8 x 74 x 7.1 mm
Weight193 g184.5 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP52
8. Battery & Charging🏆 BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh3,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A30W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed5W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothNot listed5.3
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$999
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins — BeastScore 74.3/100

After comparing all the specs, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 69.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.

Buy BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) if you want

Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,200 mAh more)

Buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 69.4 · Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W

Common questions

Which is better: BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) or Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads with an overall BeastScore of 74.3/100 compared to BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) (69.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 69.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.

What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) has a 6.51-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery.

How do BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra compare for speed?

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) scores 72/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →