BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) vs Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine): Which One Should You Buy?

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 69.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2022

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)
69/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi · 2025

Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)

Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)
69/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) wins 0 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)
BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)
0 wins
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    72
    72
  • CameraTie
    60
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    86
    86
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    68
    68
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine) has the bigger battery5,110 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine) has the bigger screen6.67" vs 6.51"
  • Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine) is lighter190 g vs 193 g
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)
  • ✓6.51" display
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)
  • ✓3 g lighter (190 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 5,110 mAh battery (+110 mAh)
  • ✓6.67" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationBBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160)Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeColor IPS TFT LCD displayAM-OLED display
Screen Size6.51"6.67"
Resolution & Density720x1600 (270 ppi)1080x2400 (395 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7nm)0 (28nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsARM Mali-G57MP2Unknown mobile GPU
Operating SystemAndroid Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB128GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary CameraN/AN/A
Telephoto ZoomNot listedNot listed
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNot listedNot listed
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/AN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight193 g190 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP64
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,110 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A45W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedv5.3
USB Port & SpeedNot listedYes
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) wins — BeastScore 69.4/100

After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.

Buy BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) if you want

Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support

Buy Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine) if you want

Significantly faster wired charging: 45W vs max 0W · Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz

Common questions

Which is better: BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) or Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)?

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) leads with an overall BeastScore of 69.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine) (69.4/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.

What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) and Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)?

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) has a 6.51-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine) has a 6.67-inch display and 5110 mAh battery.

How do BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) and Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine) compare for speed?

BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) scores 72/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine) scores 72/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →