BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay): Which One Should You Buy?
BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 67.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedGoogle Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)6472
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryBBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A)8670
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,410 mAh
- BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) has the bigger screen6.51" vs 6.14"
- Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) is lighter178 g vs 186 g
- Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) has more RAM6 GB vs 4 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) wins — BeastScore 67.4/100
After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 67.4 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+590 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 67.4 vs top rival 66.2 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+590 mAh more)
Significantly faster wired charging: 18W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 12 MP vs max 0 MP
Common questions
Which is better: BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) or Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)?
BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) leads with an overall BeastScore of 67.4/100 compared to Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) (66.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 67.4 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+590 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) and Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)?
BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) has a 6.51-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) has a 6.14-inch display and 4410 mAh battery.
How do BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) and Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) compare for speed?
BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) scores 64/100 for performance; Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) scores 72/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-A166U Galaxy A16 5G 2024 Standard Edition TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-A166T (Samsung A166)

iPhone 14
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2411DRN47G (Xiaomi Flame Blaze)

BBK Vivo Y56 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB V2225 (BBK V2225)

Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) vs BBK Vivo Y36 5G 2023 Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2318A / Y36m (BBK V2318A)
BBK Vivo Y30 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB V2160 (BBK V2160) vs BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A)
BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) vs BBK Vivo Y55 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global TD-LTE V2 128GB V2127 (BBK V2127)
BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) vs Samsung SM-A166U Galaxy A16 5G 2024 Standard Edition TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-A166T (Samsung A166)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) vs iPhone 14
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
BBK Vivo Y35 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2230A (BBK V2230A) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Related articles
All articles →
CameraOppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate
Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →