BeastCompare

BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix): Which One Should You Buy?

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2023

BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)

BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)
71/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Google · 2023

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
72/ 100
Launch price$1,799
Head-to-head

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) wins 1 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)
1 win
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
1 win
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGoogle Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
    80
    90
  • CameraTie
    60
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryBBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)
    86
    78
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    68
    68
Key differences
  • BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,821 mAh
  • Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) has the bigger screen7.57" vs 6.78"
  • BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) is lighter177 g vs 283 g
  • Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) has the faster chipGoogle Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 MT6855
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)
  • ✓106 g lighter (177 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+179 mAh)
  • ✓6.78" display
Reasons to buy Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
  • ✓$8200 cheaper at launch ($1799 vs $9999)
  • ✓48 MP main camera
  • ✓7.57" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationBBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeAM-OLED displayAM-OLED display
Screen Size6.78"7.57"
Resolution & Density1080x2400 (388 ppi)2208x1840 (380 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A1,450 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 7020 MT6855 (6nm)Google Tensor G2 (5nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G710 MP7
Operating SystemAndroid Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB512GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary CameraN/A48 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Samsung GN1
Telephoto ZoomNot listed10.8 MP (5x optical zoom), f/3.05, OIS
Ultrawide CameraN/A10.8 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNot listedNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/A8 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A158.7 x 139.7 x 12.1 mm
Weight177 g283 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIPX8
8. Battery & Charging🏆 BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh4,821 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A30W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed7W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothNot listed5.3
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 3.2
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$1799
Our verdict

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) wins — BeastScore 72.3/100

After comparing all the specs, Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 71.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.

Buy BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) if you want

Lighter body: 177g (106g lighter in hand)

Buy Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 71.4 · Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W

Common questions

Which is better: BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) or Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)?

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.3/100 compared to BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) (71.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 71.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.

What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) and Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)?

BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) has a 6.78-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) has a 7.57-inch display and 4821 mAh battery.

How do BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) and Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) compare for speed?

BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) scores 80/100 for performance; Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
Samsung

Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)

iPhone 16
Apple

iPhone 16

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
Google

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)

OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Oneplus

OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)

Xiaomi Mi 14 Civi 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 24053PY09I (Xiaomi Chenfeng)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi 14 Civi 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 24053PY09I (Xiaomi Chenfeng)

BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A)
Vivo

BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A)

Oppo Reno10 Pro+ 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU V3 256GB CPH2521 (BBK 2521)
Oppo

Oppo Reno10 Pro+ 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU V3 256GB CPH2521 (BBK 2521)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

BBK Vivo Y35+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2279A / Y35m+ (BBK V2279BA) vs BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)

Compare →
vs

BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) vs BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)

Compare →
vs

BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) vs BBK Vivo Y78t 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2312BA (BBK V2312)

Compare →
vs

BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)

Compare →
vs

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) vs Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)

Compare →
vs

BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) vs iPhone 13 Pro

Compare →
vs

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix) vs iPhone 16

Compare →
vs

BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open GateCamera
5 min read

Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate

Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.

Read →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →