BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu): Which One Should You Buy?
BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) wins 0 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie8080
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie8686
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) has the bigger battery5,100 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) has the bigger screen6.64" vs 6.3"
- Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) is lighter185.9 g vs 190 g
- Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) has the faster chipGoogle Tensor G4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 MT6855
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) wins — BeastScore 71.4/100
After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.
Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
Significantly faster wired charging: 23W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 48 MP vs max 0 MP
Common questions
Which is better: BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) or Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)?
BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) (71.4/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) and Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)?
BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) has a 6.64-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) has a 6.3-inch display and 5100 mAh battery.
How do BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) and Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) compare for speed?
BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) scores 80/100 for performance; Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
iPhone 13 Pro
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
OnePlus Nord 3 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2491 (BBK Vitamin)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) vs BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
BBK Vivo Y55 5G 2022 Standard Edition Global TD-LTE V2 128GB V2127 (BBK V2127) vs BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
BBK Vivo Y56 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB V2225 (BBK V2225) vs BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) vs BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) vs BBK Vivo Y78t 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2312BA (BBK V2312)
BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) vs iPhone 13 Pro
Related articles
All articles →
CameraOppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate
Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →