BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/C75 vs A78
Lab Benchmark Battle

C75 vs A78

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Realme · 2024

C75

C75
80/ 100
Launch MSRP$160 USD
Oppo · 2023

A78

A78
80/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS A78 BETTER THAN C75?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

C75
A78Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORC75 A78 LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz90Hz90Hz
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandard33W33W Max
Main Camera Sensor50 MP50.1 MP50.1 MP
Screen Display Size6.6"6.56"6.6"
Chassis Weight190g188g188g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy C75:
  • ✓$9839 lower launch MSRP ($160 vs $9999)
  • ✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓6.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy A78:
  • ✓2g lighter chassis (188g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓50.1MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓6.56" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationC75A78
1. Display & Screen🏆 A78 Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAMOLED / OLED displayIPS TFT LCD
Screen Size6.6"6.56"
Resolution & DensityN/A 720x1612 (269 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz90 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 C75 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android 12
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB128GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 C75 Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP50.1 MP
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens8 MP8 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 A78 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A163.8 x 75.04 x 7.99 mm
Weight190 g188 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 C75 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A33W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+Bluetooth 5.3
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CUSB C reversible
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch Price$160Price on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

A78 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 79.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, A78 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose C75:
Lower launch price: $160 (save $Infinity)
When to choose A78:
Higher overall BeastScore: 79.8 vs top rival 79.6 · Significantly faster wired charging: 33W vs max 0W
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: C75 vs A78

Which is better: C75 or A78?

A78 leads with an overall BeastScore of 79.8/100 compared to C75 (79.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 79.8 vs top rival 79.6 and Significantly faster wired charging: 33W vs max 0W.

What are the primary battery and display differences between C75 and A78?

C75 is equipped with a 6.6-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while A78 features a 6.56-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between C75 and A78?

In objective hardware benchmarks, C75 achieves a 80/100 performance score, while A78 scores 80/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open GateCamera
5 min read

Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate

Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.

Read Analysis →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read Analysis →