BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/CMF Phone 1 vs Narzo N61
Lab Benchmark Battle

CMF Phone 1 vs Narzo N61

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Nothing · 2024

CMF Phone 1

CMF Phone 1
86/ 100
Launch MSRP$199 USD
Realme · 2024

Narzo N61

Narzo N61
78/ 100
Launch MSRP$180 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS CMF Phone 1 BETTER THAN Narzo N61?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

CMF Phone 1Winner 🏆
Narzo N61

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORCMF PhoneNarzo N61LEADER
Refresh Rate120Hz60Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging33WStandard33W Max
Main Camera Sensor50 MP50 MP50 MP
Screen Display Size6.67"6.5"6.67"
Chassis Weight197g195g195g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy CMF Phone 1:
  • ✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓6.67" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Narzo N61:
  • ✓2g lighter chassis (195g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓$19 lower launch MSRP ($180 vs $199)
  • ✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationCMF Phone 1Narzo N61
1. Display & Screen🏆 CMF Phone 1 Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAMOLEDAMOLED / OLED display
Screen Size6.67"6.5"
Resolution & Density2400x1080 (395 ppi)N/A
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
Brightness2,000 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 CMF Phone 1 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB128GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 CMF Phone 1 Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.88, OIS, Sony IMX88250 MP
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens16 MP, f/2.4516 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Narzo N61 Lightest Chassis
Dimensions163.7 x 76.7 x 7.8 mmN/A
Weight197 g195 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceIP52Not certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 CMF Phone 1 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging33W wired fast chargingN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth5.3Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0USB Type-C
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch Price$199$180
Editorial Lab Verdict

CMF Phone 1 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 85.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, CMF Phone 1 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose CMF Phone 1:
Higher overall BeastScore: 85.8 vs top rival 77.6 · Significantly faster wired charging: 33W vs max 0W
When to choose Narzo N61:
Balanced specifications with Realme hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: CMF Phone 1 vs Narzo N61

Which is better: CMF Phone 1 or Narzo N61?

CMF Phone 1 leads with an overall BeastScore of 85.8/100 compared to Narzo N61 (77.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 85.8 vs top rival 77.6 and Significantly faster wired charging: 33W vs max 0W.

What are the primary battery and display differences between CMF Phone 1 and Narzo N61?

CMF Phone 1 is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Narzo N61 features a 6.5-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between CMF Phone 1 and Narzo N61?

In objective hardware benchmarks, CMF Phone 1 achieves a 80/100 performance score, while Narzo N61 scores 72/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read Analysis →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read Analysis →