Galaxy A16 5G vs Galaxy Z Fold3: Which One Should You Buy?
Galaxy A16 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 78.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Galaxy A16 5G wins 4 of 7 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedGalaxy Z Fold36490
- CameraGalaxy A16 5G8475
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieGalaxy A16 5G6040
- BatteryGalaxy A16 5G8670
- DisplayGalaxy Z Fold37486
- ConnectivityGalaxy Z Fold35783
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueGalaxy A16 5G9055
- Galaxy A16 5G has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
- Galaxy A16 5G has a sharper main camera50 MP vs 12 MP
- Galaxy Z Fold3 has a smoother screen120 Hz vs 90 Hz
- Galaxy Z Fold3 has the bigger screen7.6" vs 6.7"
- Galaxy A16 5G is lighter200 g vs 271 g
- Galaxy A16 5G launched cheaper$199 vs $1,799
- Galaxy A16 5G has a sharper selfie camera13 MP vs 4 MP
- Galaxy A16 5G has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.2
- Galaxy Z Fold3 has more RAM12 GB vs 4 GB
- Galaxy Z Fold3 has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Galaxy A16 5G wins — BeastScore 78.0/100
After comparing all the specs, Galaxy A16 5G is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more) and Higher resolution main sensor: 50 MP vs max 12 MP.
Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more) · Higher resolution main sensor: 50 MP vs max 12 MP
Dedicated optical telephoto zoom (1 lens system) · Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 90Hz
Common questions
Which is better: Galaxy A16 5G or Galaxy Z Fold3?
Galaxy A16 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 78.0/100 compared to Galaxy Z Fold3 (78.0/100), driven by advantages in Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more) and Higher resolution main sensor: 50 MP vs max 12 MP.
What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy A16 5G and Galaxy Z Fold3?
Galaxy A16 5G has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Galaxy Z Fold3 has a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do Galaxy A16 5G and Galaxy Z Fold3 compare for speed?
Galaxy A16 5G scores 64/100 for performance; Galaxy Z Fold3 scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Galaxy A16 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A18
Galaxy A16 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung SM-A145M Galaxy A14 4G 2023 Standard Edition TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A145) vs Galaxy A16 5G
Galaxy A15 5G vs Galaxy A16 5G
Galaxy A16 5G vs CMF Phone 1
Galaxy A16 5G vs P1 5G
Galaxy Z Fold3 vs Galaxy Z Fold5
Galaxy Z Fold3 vs Galaxy Z Fold4
Related articles
All articles →
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →





