Galaxy S25 FE vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle

Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄

Samsung · 2025

Galaxy S25 FE

83/ 100

Launch MSRP$649 USD

Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

83/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Galaxy S25 FE BETTER THAN Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Galaxy S25 FEWinner 🏆

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta

SPEC FACTOR	Galaxy S25	Xiaomi Black	LEADER
Refresh Rate	120Hz	120Hz	120Hz
Battery Capacity	4,900 mAh	6,600 mAh	+6,600 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	45W	Standard	45W Max
Main Camera Sensor	50 MP	50 MP	50 MP
Screen Display Size	6.7"	10.1"	10.1"
Chassis Weight	190g	N/A	190g Lightest

Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄

Reasons to buy Galaxy S25 FE:

✓809g lighter chassis (190g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
✓$9350 lower launch MSRP ($649 vs $9999)
✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording

Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE:

✓Larger 6,600 mAh battery capacity (+1,700 mAh more capacity)
✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
✓10.1" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄

Specification	Galaxy S25 FE	Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Wins Display
Screen Type & Tech	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	AMOLED
Screen Size	6.7"	10.1"
Resolution & Density	2340x1080 (385 ppi)	FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate	120 Hz ProMotion	120 Hz ProMotion
Brightness	1,900 nits peak	N/A
Screen Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	Scratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy S25 FE Wins Performance
Chipset / Processor	High performance SoC	Helio G85
CPU Cores	Multi-core high performance	Multi-core high performance
GPU Graphics	Integrated Graphics	Integrated Graphics
Operating System	Android 16	Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory	8 GB LPDDR	6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage	128GB / 256GB / 512GB	128 GB
Storage Speed	High-speed flash	High-speed flash
Card Slot	No	No
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy S25 FE Wins Camera
Primary Camera	50 MP, f/1.8, OIS	50 MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto Zoom	8 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4, OIS	None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera	12 MP, f/2.2	N/A
LiDAR / Depth	None	None
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens	12 MP, f/2.2	12 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Galaxy S25 FE Lightest Chassis
Dimensions	161.3 x 76.6 x 7.4 mm	N/A
Weight	190 g	N/A
Build Materials	Glass front, metal/glass frame	Glass front, metal/glass frame
SIM Type	Nano-SIM / eSIM support	Nano-SIM / eSIM support
Water Resistance	IP68	Not certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Wins Battery
Battery Capacity	4,900 mAh	6,600 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	45W wired fast charging	Fast charging
Wireless Charging	15W wireless charging	Not supported
Reverse Charging	Reverse wireless charging	Reverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
Loudspeaker	Stereo speakers	Stereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone Jack	No	No
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi Standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth	5.4	Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & Speed	USB-C 3.2	USB Type-C
NFC	Yes (contactless payment)	Yes
11. Sensors & Security
Sensors	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite Features	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
Colors	Standard finishes	Standard finishes
Launch Price	$649	Price on request

Editorial Lab Verdict

Galaxy S25 FE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Galaxy S25 FE ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Galaxy S25 FE:

Higher overall BeastScore: 82.8 vs top rival 82.6 · Significantly faster wired charging: 45W vs max 0W

When to choose Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE:

Larger battery capacity: 6,600 mAh (+1,700 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 10.1" vs max 6.7" for media & multitasking

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Galaxy S25 FE vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

Which is better: Galaxy S25 FE or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

Galaxy S25 FE leads with an overall BeastScore of 82.8/100 compared to Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE (82.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 82.8 vs top rival 82.6 and Significantly faster wired charging: 45W vs max 0W.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Galaxy S25 FE and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

Galaxy S25 FE is equipped with a 6.7-inch display and 4900 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE features a 10.1-inch display and 6600 mAh battery.