Honor Watch ES vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) BETTER THAN Honor Watch ES?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Honor Watch | Samsung Galaxy | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 180 mAh | 590 mAh | +590 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 1.64" | 1.5" | 1.64" |
| Chassis Weight | 21g | 605g | 21g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Honor Watch ES vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
Which is better: Honor Watch ES or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) leads with an overall BeastScore of 92.0/100 compared to Honor Watch ES (78.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 92.0 vs top rival 78.0 and Larger battery capacity: 590 mAh (+410 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Honor Watch ES and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?
Honor Watch ES is equipped with a 1.64-inch display and 180 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) features a 1.5-inch display and 590 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Honor Watch ES and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Honor Watch ES achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) scores 94/100.
Related Smartwatches (Based on Benchmark Scores)
More Smartwatches Battles
Honor Watch ES vs Allview Allwatch
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch
Honor Watch ES vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
Honor Watch ES vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid T
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid T
Honor Watch ES vs Allview Allwatch V
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch V
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Hardware AnalysisApple Watch Series 12 & Ultra 4 Deep Dive: S11 Silicon, Next-Gen Health Sensing System, Audio Intelligence, and Ceramic Design Breakdown
An architectural deep dive into Apple Watch Series 12 and Ultra 4: S11 SiP silicon, high-frequency optical PPG arrays, on-device Audio Intelligence, Longevity health age modeling, and the return of ceramic engineering.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.