iPhone 13 Pro vs Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366): Which One Should You Buy?
Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
iPhone 13 Pro
Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366)
Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366)7280
- CameraiPhone 13 Pro7560
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatterySamsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366)5886
- DisplayiPhone 13 Pro8662
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueSamsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366)5568
- Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 3,095 mAh
- Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) has the bigger screen6.66" vs 6.1"
- Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) is lighter197 g vs 203 g
- Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
- iPhone 13 Pro has the faster chipApple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1380 5G S5E8835
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) wins — BeastScore 71.4/100
After comparing all the specs, Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 71.0 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,905 mAh more).
Significantly faster wired charging: 20W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 12 MP vs max 0 MP
Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 71.0 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,905 mAh more)
Common questions
Which is better: iPhone 13 Pro or Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366)?
Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to iPhone 13 Pro (71.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 71.0 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,905 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between iPhone 13 Pro and Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366)?
iPhone 13 Pro has a 6.1-inch display and 3095 mAh battery. Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) has a 6.66-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do iPhone 13 Pro and Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) compare for speed?
iPhone 13 Pro scores 72/100 for performance; Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
iPhone 16
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
OnePlus Nord 3 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2491 (BBK Vitamin)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
iPhone 13 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro
iPhone 13 Pro vs iPhone 14 Pro
iPhone 13 Pro vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
iPhone 13 Pro vs iPhone 16
Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) vs iPhone 16
iPhone 13 Pro vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Samsung SM-E366B/DS Galaxy F36 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung E366) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Related articles
All articles →
Deep DiveSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner
We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.
Read →
BenchmarkHere are the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max Geekbench scores
First verified Geekbench 6 results show Apple's 2nm A20 Pro achieving 3,924 single-core and 10,876 multi-core scores, establishing a decisive computing lead.
Read →
MarketTrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026
TrendForce forecasts Apple will capture 25.2% of worldwide foldable smartphone shipments in 2026 following the iPhone Duo release, reshaping competition with Samsung.
Read →