iPhone 13 Pro vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7): Which One Should You Buy?
iPhone 13 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
iPhone 13 Pro
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)7290
- CameraiPhone 13 Pro7560
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatterySamsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)5870
- DisplayiPhone 13 Pro8662
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueSamsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)5568
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has the bigger battery4,400 mAh vs 3,095 mAh
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has the bigger screen6.49" vs 6.1"
- iPhone 13 Pro is lighter203 g vs 215 g
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has more RAM12 GB vs 6 GB
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AC vs Apple A15 Bionic
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄iPhone 13 Pro wins — BeastScore 71.0/100
After comparing all the specs, iPhone 13 Pro is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 71.0 vs top rival 70.7 and Significantly faster wired charging: 20W vs max 0W.
Higher overall BeastScore: 71.0 vs top rival 70.7 · Significantly faster wired charging: 20W vs max 0W
Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+1,305 mAh more) · More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 6GB
Common questions
Which is better: iPhone 13 Pro or Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)?
iPhone 13 Pro leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.0/100 compared to Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) (70.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.0 vs top rival 70.7 and Significantly faster wired charging: 20W vs max 0W.
What are the main battery and display differences between iPhone 13 Pro and Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)?
iPhone 13 Pro has a 6.1-inch display and 3095 mAh battery. Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do iPhone 13 Pro and Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) compare for speed?
iPhone 13 Pro scores 72/100 for performance; Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
iPhone 16
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
OnePlus Nord 3 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2491 (BBK Vitamin)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
iPhone 13 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro
iPhone 13 Pro vs iPhone 14 Pro
iPhone 13 Pro vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
iPhone 13 Pro vs iPhone 16
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
iPhone 13 Pro vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Related articles
All articles →
Deep DiveSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner
We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.
Read →
BenchmarkHere are the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max Geekbench scores
First verified Geekbench 6 results show Apple's 2nm A20 Pro achieving 3,924 single-core and 10,876 multi-core scores, establishing a decisive computing lead.
Read →
MarketTrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026
TrendForce forecasts Apple will capture 25.2% of worldwide foldable smartphone shipments in 2026 following the iPhone Duo release, reshaping competition with Samsung.
Read →