iPhone 15 Plus vs Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS iPhone 15 Plus BETTER THAN Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | iPhone 15 | Samsung SM-F966N | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,383 mAh | 4,400 mAh | +4,400 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 27W | Standard | 27W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | 48 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.7" | 6.49" | 6.7" |
| Chassis Weight | 201g | 215g | 201g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄iPhone 15 Plus edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.1/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, iPhone 15 Plus ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: iPhone 15 Plus vs Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7)
Which is better: iPhone 15 Plus or Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
iPhone 15 Plus leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.1/100 compared to Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) (72.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.1 vs top rival 72.0 and Significantly faster wired charging: 27W vs max 0W.
What are the primary battery and display differences between iPhone 15 Plus and Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
iPhone 15 Plus is equipped with a 6.7-inch display and 4383 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) features a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between iPhone 15 Plus and Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, iPhone 15 Plus achieves a 72/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) scores 95/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)

iPhone 16
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)

OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)

Xiaomi Mi 14 Civi 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 24053PY09I (Xiaomi Chenfeng)

BBK Vivo S17t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2282A (BBK V2282A)

Oppo Reno10 Pro+ 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU V3 256GB CPH2521 (BBK 2521)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones Battles
iPhone 15 Plus vs iPhone 16 Plus
iPhone 14 Plus vs iPhone 15 Plus
iPhone 15 Pro vs iPhone 15 Plus
iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 15 Plus
iPhone 15 Plus vs iPhone 15
iPhone 15 Plus vs Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
Samsung SM-F966N Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE KR 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-S936B Galaxy S25+ 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung Paradigm 2)
iPhone 15 Plus vs iPhone 16
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Deep DiveSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner
We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.
BenchmarkHere are the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max Geekbench scores
First verified Geekbench 6 results show Apple's 2nm A20 Pro achieving 3,924 single-core and 10,876 multi-core scores, establishing a decisive computing lead.
MarketTrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026
TrendForce forecasts Apple will capture 25.2% of worldwide foldable smartphone shipments in 2026 following the iPhone Duo release, reshaping competition with Samsung.

