iPhone 16 Plus vs Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx) BETTER THAN iPhone 16 Plus?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | iPhone 16 | Xiaomi Poco | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,674 mAh | 7,550 mAh | +7,550 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 27W | Standard | 27W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | 48 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.7" | 6.83" | 6.83" |
| Chassis Weight | 199g | 222g | 199g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 75.9/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: iPhone 16 Plus vs Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)
Which is better: iPhone 16 Plus or Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)?
Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx) leads with an overall BeastScore of 75.9/100 compared to iPhone 16 Plus (75.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 75.9 vs top rival 75.7 and Larger battery capacity: 7,550 mAh (+2,876 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between iPhone 16 Plus and Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)?
iPhone 16 Plus is equipped with a 6.7-inch display and 4674 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx) features a 6.83-inch display and 7550 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between iPhone 16 Plus and Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, iPhone 16 Plus achieves a 80/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx) scores 90/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy A06

iPhone 16 Pro
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB GM66V (Google Rango)

OnePlus Ace 3V 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJF110 (BBK Audi)

Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25067PYE3C (Xiaomi Luming)

BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419)

Oppo Find X8 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2659 (BBK 2659)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones Battles
iPhone 14 Plus vs iPhone 16 Plus
iPhone 15 Plus vs iPhone 16 Plus
iPhone 16 Plus vs iPhone 16e
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs iPhone 16 Plus
iPhone 16 Plus vs iPhone 16 Pro
iPhone 16 Plus vs iPhone 16
Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble) vs Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)
POCO F6 vs Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Deep DiveSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner
We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.
BenchmarkHere are the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max Geekbench scores
First verified Geekbench 6 results show Apple's 2nm A20 Pro achieving 3,924 single-core and 10,876 multi-core scores, establishing a decisive computing lead.
MarketTrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026
TrendForce forecasts Apple will capture 25.2% of worldwide foldable smartphone shipments in 2026 following the iPhone Duo release, reshaping competition with Samsung.

