Magic4 Ultimate vs Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun) BETTER THAN Magic4 Ultimate?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Magic4 Ultimate | Xiaomi Mi | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,600 mAh | 6,100 mAh | +6,100 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 50 MP | N/A | 50 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.81" | 6.73" | 6.81" |
| Chassis Weight | 242g | 216g | 216g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 77.2/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Magic4 Ultimate vs Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)
Which is better: Magic4 Ultimate or Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)?
Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun) leads with an overall BeastScore of 77.2/100 compared to Magic4 Ultimate (77.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 77.2 vs top rival 77.0 and Larger battery capacity: 6,100 mAh (+1,500 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Magic4 Ultimate and Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)?
Magic4 Ultimate is equipped with a 6.81-inch display and 4600 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun) features a 6.73-inch display and 6100 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Magic4 Ultimate and Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Magic4 Ultimate achieves a 90/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun) scores 95/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
More Smartphones Battles
Magic4 Ultimate vs Magic6 Ultimate
Magic4 Ultimate vs Magic5 Ultimate
Xiaomi Mi 12S Pro 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2206122SC (Xiaomi Unicorn) vs Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)
Xiaomi Mi 15T Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 2506BPN68G (Xiaomi Klimt) vs Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)
Magic4 Ultimate vs SM-S901B/DS Galaxy S22 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE EU 128GB
Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun) vs SM-S901B/DS Galaxy S22 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE EU 128GB
Magic4 Ultimate vs iPhone 17
Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun) vs iPhone 17
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.








