Magic5 vs Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
Magic5
Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)
WHY IS Magic5 BETTER THAN Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Magic5 | Xiaomi Poco | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,100 mAh | 7,550 mAh | +7,550 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 50 MP | N/A | 50 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.81" | 6.83" | 6.83" |
| Chassis Weight | 204g | 222g | 204g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Magic5 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 76.1/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Magic5 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Magic5 vs Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)
Which is better: Magic5 or Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)?
Magic5 leads with an overall BeastScore of 76.1/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx) (75.9/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 76.1 vs top rival 75.9 and Higher resolution main sensor: 50 MP vs max 0 MP.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Magic5 and Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)?
Magic5 is equipped with a 6.81-inch display and 5100 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx) features a 6.83-inch display and 7550 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Magic5 and Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Magic5 achieves a 80/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx) scores 90/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Galaxy A06
iPhone 16 Plus
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB GM66V (Google Rango)
Open
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25067PYE3C (Xiaomi Luming)
BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419)
Oppo Find X8 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2659 (BBK 2659)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones Battles
Magic5 vs Honor Magic8
Magic5 vs HONOR Magic5 Pro
Magic5 vs Magic5 Ultimate
Magic5 vs Honor Magic5 Lite
Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble) vs Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)
POCO F6 vs Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)
Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx) vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx) vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.