Mi 12T Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot): Which One Should You Buy?
Mi 12T Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 88.2/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Mi 12T Pro wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie9090
- CameraMi 12T Pro9560
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryMi 12T Pro9086
- DisplayMi 12T Pro8662
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot) is lighter200 g vs 205 g
- Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot) has the faster chipMediaTek Dimensity 9200+ MT6985Z vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 5G SM8475
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Mi 12T Pro wins — BeastScore 88.2/100
After comparing all the specs, Mi 12T Pro is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 88.2 vs top rival 73.9 and Significantly faster wired charging: 120W vs max 0W.
Higher overall BeastScore: 88.2 vs top rival 73.9 · Significantly faster wired charging: 120W vs max 0W
Balanced specifications with Xiaomi hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
Common questions
Which is better: Mi 12T Pro or Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot)?
Mi 12T Pro leads with an overall BeastScore of 88.2/100 compared to Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot) (73.9/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 88.2 vs top rival 73.9 and Significantly faster wired charging: 120W vs max 0W.
What are the main battery and display differences between Mi 12T Pro and Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot)?
Mi 12T Pro has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot) has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do Mi 12T Pro and Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot) compare for speed?
Mi 12T Pro scores 90/100 for performance; Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot) scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Mi 12T Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 15T Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 2506BPN68G (Xiaomi Klimt)
Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot) vs Xiaomi Mi 15T Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 2506BPN68G (Xiaomi Klimt)
Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot) vs Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2304FPN6DC (Xiaomi Ishtar)
Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot) vs Mi 13 Lite
Mi 12T Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot) vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Mi 12T Pro vs iPhone 18 Pro
Xiaomi Mi 13T Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB A301XM (Xiaomi Corot) vs iPhone 14 Pro
Related articles
All articles →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
CameraOppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate
Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →





