Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7): Which One Should You Buy?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)8095
- CameraMotorola Razr 40 Ultra7260
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatterySamsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)5870
- DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra9662
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueSamsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)5568
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) has the bigger battery4,400 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.49"
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is lighter184.5 g vs 215 g
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) has more RAM16 GB vs 8 GB
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AC vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins — BeastScore 74.3/100
After comparing all the specs, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 72.0 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.
Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 72.0 · Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W
Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+600 mAh more) · More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 8GB
Common questions
Which is better: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads with an overall BeastScore of 74.3/100 compared to Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) (72.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 72.0 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.
What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery. Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) has a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) compare for speed?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100 for performance; Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) scores 95/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

iPhone 14 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)

OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)

Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)

BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
More Smartphones comparisons
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs iPhone 16
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
Related articles
All articles →
TeaserMotorola starts teasing its own wide foldable smartphone in response to the iPhone Duo
Motorola has published official teaser sketches of an upcoming wide-format book-style foldable aimed at competing directly with the iPhone Duo and Galaxy Fold.
Read →
Hardware AnalysisApple Watch Series 12 & Ultra 4 Deep Dive: S11 Silicon, Next-Gen Health Sensing System, Audio Intelligence, and Ceramic Design Breakdown
An architectural deep dive into Apple Watch Series 12 and Ultra 4: S11 SiP silicon, high-frequency optical PPG arrays, on-device Audio Intelligence, Longevity health age modeling, and the return of ceramic engineering.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →