Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch): Which One Should You Buy?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins 4 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie8080
- CameraMotorola Razr 40 Ultra7260
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieMotorola Razr 40 Ultra8876
- BatteryXiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch)5878
- DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra9662
- ConnectivityMotorola Razr 40 Ultra7570
- SecurityTie3434
- ValueXiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch)5568
- Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch) has the bigger battery4,500 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
- Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch) charges faster67W vs 30W
- Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch) has a sharper main camera64 MP vs 12 MP
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.67"
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is lighter184.5 g vs 195 g
- Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch) launched cheaper$399 vs $999
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.2
- Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch) is better protected from water and dustIP53 vs IP52
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins — BeastScore 74.3/100
After comparing all the specs, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 69.8 and Smoother display: 165Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz.
Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 69.8 · Smoother display: 165Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz
Larger battery capacity: 4,500 mAh (+700 mAh more) · Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 30W
Common questions
Which is better: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch)?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads with an overall BeastScore of 74.3/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch) (69.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 69.8 and Smoother display: 165Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz.
What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch)?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch) has a 6.67-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.
How do Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch) compare for speed?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
iPhone 14 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)
Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)
BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)
Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
More Smartphones comparisons
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch) vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
Xiaomi Poco F4 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 22021211RG (Xiaomi Munch) vs Pixel 6a
Related articles
All articles →
TeaserMotorola starts teasing its own wide foldable smartphone in response to the iPhone Duo
Motorola has published official teaser sketches of an upcoming wide-format book-style foldable aimed at competing directly with the iPhone Duo and Galaxy Fold.
Read →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Hardware AnalysisApple Watch Series 12 & Ultra 4 Deep Dive: S11 Silicon, Next-Gen Health Sensing System, Audio Intelligence, and Ceramic Design Breakdown
An architectural deep dive into Apple Watch Series 12 and Ultra 4: S11 SiP silicon, high-frequency optical PPG arrays, on-device Audio Intelligence, Longevity health age modeling, and the return of ceramic engineering.
Read →