Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs vivo V29: Which One Should You Buy?
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
vivo V29
vivo V29 wins 4 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedMotorola Razr 50 Ultra9080
- CameraTie8888
- VideoNot enough data
- Selfievivo V2988100
- Batteryvivo V297078
- DisplayMotorola Razr 50 Ultra10088
- ConnectivityMotorola Razr 50 Ultra8363
- Securityvivo V291434
- Valuevivo V295580
- vivo V29 has the bigger battery4,600 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra charges faster45W vs 44W
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.78"
- vivo V29 is lighter186 g vs 189 g
- vivo V29 launched cheaper$449 vs $1,099
- vivo V29 has a sharper selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6
- vivo V29 is better protected from water and dustIP54 vs IP48
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins — BeastScore 84.0/100
After comparing all the specs, Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 83.2 and Smoother display: 165Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz.
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 83.2 · Smoother display: 165Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz
Larger battery capacity: 4,600 mAh (+600 mAh more) · Lower launch price: $449 (save $650)
Common questions
Which is better: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or vivo V29?
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.0/100 compared to vivo V29 (83.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 83.2 and Smoother display: 165Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz.
What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and vivo V29?
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 4000 mAh battery. vivo V29 has a 6.78-inch display and 4600 mAh battery.
How do Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and vivo V29 compare for speed?
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra scores 90/100 for performance; vivo V29 scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Galaxy Z Flip6 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
vivo V29 vs vivo V70 5G
V27 vs vivo V29
vivo V29e (India) vs vivo V29
Related articles
All articles →
TeaserMotorola starts teasing its own wide foldable smartphone in response to the iPhone Duo
Motorola has published official teaser sketches of an upcoming wide-format book-style foldable aimed at competing directly with the iPhone Duo and Galaxy Fold.
Read →
Hardware AnalysisApple Watch Series 12 & Ultra 4 Deep Dive: S11 Silicon, Next-Gen Health Sensing System, Audio Intelligence, and Ceramic Design Breakdown
An architectural deep dive into Apple Watch Series 12 and Ultra 4: S11 SiP silicon, high-frequency optical PPG arrays, on-device Audio Intelligence, Longevity health age modeling, and the return of ceramic engineering.
Read →
Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep DiveIntel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.
Read →