Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) vs Samsung SM-E176B/DS Galaxy F17 5G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A176): Which One Should You Buy?
Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 67.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) wins 0 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie6464
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie8686
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) has the bigger screen6.72" vs 6.66"
- Samsung SM-E176B/DS Galaxy F17 5G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A176) is lighter192 g vs 193 g
- Samsung SM-E176B/DS Galaxy F17 5G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A176) has the faster chipSamsung Exynos 1330 5G S5E8535 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 MT6833
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) wins — BeastScore 67.4/100
After comparing all the specs, Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Balanced specifications with Oppo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.
Balanced specifications with Oppo hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
Balanced specifications with Samsung hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
Common questions
Which is better: Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) or Samsung SM-E176B/DS Galaxy F17 5G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A176)?
Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) leads with an overall BeastScore of 67.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-E176B/DS Galaxy F17 5G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A176) (67.4/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Oppo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.
What are the main battery and display differences between Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) and Samsung SM-E176B/DS Galaxy F17 5G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A176)?
Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) has a 6.72-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Samsung SM-E176B/DS Galaxy F17 5G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A176) has a 6.66-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) and Samsung SM-E176B/DS Galaxy F17 5G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A176) compare for speed?
Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) scores 64/100 for performance; Samsung SM-E176B/DS Galaxy F17 5G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A176) scores 64/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-A166U Galaxy A16 5G 2024 Standard Edition TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-A166T (Samsung A166)

iPhone 14
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2411DRN47G (Xiaomi Flame Blaze)

BBK Vivo Y56 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB V2225 (BBK V2225)

Oppo A60 5G 2024 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB CPH2683 / A3 (BBK 2683)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Oppo A77 4G 2022 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 128GB CPH2385 (BBK 2385) vs Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557)
A78 vs Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557)
Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) vs A80
Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) vs Samsung SM-A166U Galaxy A16 5G 2024 Standard Edition TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-A166T (Samsung A166)
Samsung SM-E176B/DS Galaxy F17 5G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A176) vs Samsung SM-A166U Galaxy A16 5G 2024 Standard Edition TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-A166T (Samsung A166)
Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) vs iPhone 14
Samsung SM-E176B/DS Galaxy F17 5G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A176) vs iPhone 14
Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Related articles
All articles →
CameraOppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate
Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →