BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Oppo Pad SE vs vivo X90 Pro
Lab Benchmark Battle

Oppo Pad SE vs vivo X90 Pro

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across โ‡„
Oppo

Oppo Pad SE

Oppo Pad SE
85/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Vivo ยท 2022

vivo X90 Pro

vivo X90 Pro
85/ 100
Launch MSRP$1,099 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Oppo Pad SE BETTER THAN vivo X90 Pro?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Oppo Pad SEWinner ๐Ÿ†
vivo X90 Pro

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTOROppo Padvivo X90LEADER
Refresh Rate120Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity9,340 mAh4,870 mAh+9,340 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandard120W120W Max
Main Camera Sensor50 MP50 MP50 MP
Screen Display Size11"6.78"11"
Chassis WeightN/A215g215g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across โ‡„
Reasons to buy Oppo Pad SE:
  • โœ“Larger 9,340 mAh battery capacity (+4,470 mAh more capacity)
  • โœ“50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • โœ“11" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy vivo X90 Pro:
  • โœ“784g lighter chassis (215g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • โœ“$8900 lower launch MSRP ($1099 vs $9999)
  • โœ“50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across โ‡„
SpecificationOppo Pad SEvivo X90 Pro
1. Display & Screen๐Ÿ† Oppo Pad SE Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Screen Size11"6.78"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED 2800x1260 (452 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A1,800 nits peak
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance๐Ÿ† vivo X90 Pro Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHelio G100 High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256 GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics๐Ÿ† vivo X90 Pro Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, Triple Camera System50 MP, f/1.75, OIS, Sony IMX989
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)12 MP (2x optical zoom), f/1.98, OIS
Ultrawide CameraN/A48 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens12 MP32 MP, f/2.45
7. Body & Dimensions๐Ÿ† vivo X90 Pro Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A164.2 x 75.1 x 9.7 mm
WeightN/A215 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedIP68
8. Battery & Charging๐Ÿ† Oppo Pad SE Wins Battery
Battery Capacity9,340 mAh4,870 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast charging120W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot supported50W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+5.3
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on request$1099
Editorial Lab Verdict

Oppo Pad SE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 85.3/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Oppo Pad SE ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Oppo Pad SE:
Higher overall BeastScore: 85.3 vs top rival 84.8 ยท Larger battery capacity: 9,340 mAh (+4,470 mAh more)
When to choose vivo X90 Pro:
Significantly faster wired charging: 120W vs max 0W ยท Dedicated optical telephoto zoom (1 lens system)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Oppo Pad SE vs vivo X90 Pro

Which is better: Oppo Pad SE or vivo X90 Pro?

Oppo Pad SE leads with an overall BeastScore of 85.3/100 compared to vivo X90 Pro (84.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 85.3 vs top rival 84.8 and Larger battery capacity: 9,340 mAh (+4,470 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Oppo Pad SE and vivo X90 Pro?

Oppo Pad SE is equipped with a 11-inch display and 9340 mAh battery, while vivo X90 Pro features a 6.78-inch display and 4870 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Oppo Pad SE and vivo X90 Pro?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Oppo Pad SE achieves a 79/100 performance score, while vivo X90 Pro scores 90/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News โ†’
Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open GateCamera
5 min read

Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate

Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.

Read Analysis โ†’
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis โ†’
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read Analysis โ†’