POCO F4 vs vivo Y200 Pro
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
POCO F4
vivo Y200 Pro
WHY IS POCO F4 BETTER THAN vivo Y200 Pro?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | POCO F4 | vivo Y200 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh | +5,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 67W | Standard | 67W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | 64 MP | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.67" | 6.78" | 6.78" |
| Chassis Weight | 195g | N/A | 195g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄POCO F4 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 83.2/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, POCO F4 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: POCO F4 vs vivo Y200 Pro
Which is better: POCO F4 or vivo Y200 Pro?
POCO F4 leads with an overall BeastScore of 83.2/100 compared to vivo Y200 Pro (82.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 83.2 vs top rival 82.8 and Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 0W.
What are the primary battery and display differences between POCO F4 and vivo Y200 Pro?
POCO F4 is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 4500 mAh battery, while vivo Y200 Pro features a 6.78-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between POCO F4 and vivo Y200 Pro?
In objective hardware benchmarks, POCO F4 achieves a 80/100 performance score, while vivo Y200 Pro scores 79/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
More Smartphones Battles
POCO F4 vs POCO F6
POCO F4 vs Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble)
POCO F3 vs POCO F4
vivo Y200 Pro vs vivo Y400 Pro 5G
vivo Y200 Pro vs vivo Y500 Pro 5G (China)
POCO F4 vs Galaxy A37 5G
vivo Y200 Pro vs Galaxy A37 5G
POCO F4 vs Apple iPad mini (2024)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.