BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/POCO F5 vs Oppo Pad SE
Lab Benchmark Battle

POCO F5 vs Oppo Pad SE

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Poco · 2023

POCO F5

POCO F5
85/ 100
Launch MSRP$379 USD
Oppo

Oppo Pad SE

Oppo Pad SE
85/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Oppo Pad SE BETTER THAN POCO F5?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

POCO F5
Oppo Pad SEWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORPOCO F5Oppo PadLEADER
Refresh Rate120Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh9,340 mAh+9,340 mAh
Wired Fast Charging67WStandard67W Max
Main Camera Sensor64 MP50 MP64 MP
Screen Display Size6.67"11"11"
Chassis Weight181gN/A181g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy POCO F5:
  • ✓818g lighter chassis (181g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓$9620 lower launch MSRP ($379 vs $9999)
  • ✓64MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
Reasons to buy Oppo Pad SE:
  • ✓Larger 9,340 mAh battery capacity (+4,340 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓11" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationPOCO F5Oppo Pad SE
1. Display & Screen🏆 Oppo Pad SE Wins Display
Screen Type & TechFlow AMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.67"11"
Resolution & Density2400x1080 (395 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
Brightness1,000 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 POCO F5 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC Helio G100
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid 13Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB256 GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 POCO F5 Wins Camera
Primary Camera64 MP, f/1.8, OIS, Sony IMX68650 MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera8 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens16 MP, f/2.512 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 POCO F5 Lightest Chassis
Dimensions161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mmN/A
Weight181 gN/A
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceIP53Not certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Oppo Pad SE Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh9,340 mAh
Wired Fast Charging67W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth5.3Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0USB Type-C
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch Price$379Price on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Oppo Pad SE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 85.3/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Oppo Pad SE ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose POCO F5:
Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 64 MP vs max 50 MP
When to choose Oppo Pad SE:
Higher overall BeastScore: 85.3 vs top rival 84.8 · Larger battery capacity: 9,340 mAh (+4,340 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: POCO F5 vs Oppo Pad SE

Which is better: POCO F5 or Oppo Pad SE?

Oppo Pad SE leads with an overall BeastScore of 85.3/100 compared to POCO F5 (84.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 85.3 vs top rival 84.8 and Larger battery capacity: 9,340 mAh (+4,340 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between POCO F5 and Oppo Pad SE?

POCO F5 is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Oppo Pad SE features a 11-inch display and 9340 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between POCO F5 and Oppo Pad SE?

In objective hardware benchmarks, POCO F5 achieves a 80/100 performance score, while Oppo Pad SE scores 79/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open GateCamera
5 min read

Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate

Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.

Read Analysis →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read Analysis →