Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition vs Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY BETTER THAN Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Redmi 10 | Redmi Note | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | 90Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh | +6,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 18W | 33W | 33W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | 50.3 MP | 50.1 MP | 50.3 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.5" | 6.43" | 6.5" |
| Chassis Weight | 192g | 179g | 179g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY edges ahead with a BeastScore of 78.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition vs Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY
Which is better: Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition or Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY?
Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY leads with an overall BeastScore of 78.0/100 compared to Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition (77.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 78.0 vs top rival 77.8 and Significantly faster wired charging: 33W vs max 18W.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition and Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY?
Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition is equipped with a 6.5-inch display and 6000 mAh battery, while Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY features a 6.43-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition and Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition achieves a 64/100 performance score, while Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY scores 64/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
More Smartphones Battles
Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition vs Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 22071219AI (Xiaomi Rock)
Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire)
Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 23021RAA2Y (Xiaomi Topaz)
Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition vs Galaxy A16 5G
Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY vs Galaxy A16 5G
Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition vs iPhone Air
Redmi Note 11 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2201117TY vs iPhone Air
Redmi 10 Prime 2022 Standard Edition vs Pixel 7a
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Flagship Power & GaN Lab Test 2026Anker Prime 250W vs. UGREEN Nexode 300W vs. Shargeek 170 vs. Baseus Blade HD 100W: The Definitive Flagship GaN Fast Charger & High-Wattage Power Bank Architecture, USB-PD 3.1 140W EPR Protocol, Multi-Port Power Allocation, Thermal Dissipation, and Real-World Efficiency Showdown (2026)
Gallium Nitride III semiconductors, USB-PD 3.1 Extended Power Range (28V/5A), dynamic multi-port power splitting, IPS digital telemetry displays, and thermal throttling under sustained 250W+ loads compared across top desktop charging stations and portable battery banks.








