Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Samsung SM-E156B/DS Galaxy F15 5G 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM Global TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung M156): Which One Should You Buy?
Samsung Galaxy F16 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Samsung SM-E156B/DS Galaxy F15 5G 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM Global TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung M156) wins 2 of 3 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. "From specs" scores compare only the specs both phones list. How we score
- Speedfrom specsSamsung Galaxy F165751
- CameraNot enough data
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatterySamsung SM-E156B/DS Galaxy F15 5G 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM Global TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung M156)3996
- DisplaySamsung SM-E156B/DS Galaxy F15 5G 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM Global TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung M156)3962
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueNot enough data
- Samsung SM-E156B/DS Galaxy F15 5G 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM Global TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung M156) has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Samsung Galaxy F16 has the bigger screen6.7" vs 6.45"
- Samsung Galaxy F16 is lighter191 g vs 217 g
- Samsung Galaxy F16 has more RAM8 GB vs 4 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Samsung Galaxy F16 wins — BeastScore 86.0/100
After comparing all the specs, Samsung Galaxy F16 is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 69.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 25W vs max 0W.
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 69.4 · Significantly faster wired charging: 25W vs max 0W
Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more)
Common questions
Which is better: Samsung Galaxy F16 or Samsung SM-E156B/DS Galaxy F15 5G 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM Global TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung M156)?
Samsung Galaxy F16 leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Samsung SM-E156B/DS Galaxy F15 5G 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM Global TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung M156) (69.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 69.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 25W vs max 0W.
What are the main battery and display differences between Samsung Galaxy F16 and Samsung SM-E156B/DS Galaxy F15 5G 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM Global TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung M156)?
Samsung Galaxy F16 has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Samsung SM-E156B/DS Galaxy F15 5G 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM Global TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung M156) has a 6.45-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Samsung Galaxy F14 4G vs Samsung Galaxy F16
Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Samsung Galaxy F17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Xiaomi Redmi A7
Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Xiaomi 17T 5G
Samsung Galaxy F16 vs POCO X6
Samsung SM-E156B/DS Galaxy F15 5G 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM Global TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung M156) vs Samsung Galaxy F17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F14 4G vs Samsung SM-E156B/DS Galaxy F15 5G 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM Global TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung M156)
Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Samsung Galaxy A08
Related articles
All articles →
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →





