Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
WHY IS Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Samsung Galaxy | Samsung SM-G736U1 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 60Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,350 mAh | 4,050 mAh | +4,350 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 50 MP | N/A | 50 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.6" | 6.58" | 6.6" |
| Chassis Weight | N/A | 240g | 240g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Which is better: Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.0/100 compared to Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) (66.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 89.0 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 4,350 mAh (+300 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro is equipped with a 6.6-inch display and 4350 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) features a 6.58-inch display and 4050 mAh battery.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
More Smartphones Battles
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Apple iPhone 18 Pro
vivo V70 5G vs Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Huawei nova 16s Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Huawei nova 16 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.