Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) vs Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066)
Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm)
WHY IS Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) BETTER THAN Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Samsung SM-A066E/DS | Xiaomi Redmi | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh | +5,160 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.74" | 6.88" | 6.88" |
| Chassis Weight | 191g | 212.35g | 191g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 67.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) vs Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm)
Which is better: Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) or Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm)?
Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) leads with an overall BeastScore of 67.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm) (67.4/100), driven by advantages in Lighter body: 191g (21g lighter in hand).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) and Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm)?
Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) is equipped with a 6.74-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm) features a 6.88-inch display and 5160 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) and Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) achieves a 64/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm) scores 64/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung SM-M075F/DS Galaxy M07 4G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB (Samsung A075)
iPhone 14
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2411DRN47G (Xiaomi Flame Blaze)
BBK Vivo Y56 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB V2225 (BBK V2225)
Oppo A60 5G 2024 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB CPH2683 / A3 (BBK 2683)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones Battles
Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm) vs Xiaomi Redmi A7
Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm) vs Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G
Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) vs Samsung SM-M075F/DS Galaxy M07 4G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB (Samsung A075)
Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm) vs Samsung SM-M075F/DS Galaxy M07 4G 2025 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB (Samsung A075)
Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) vs iPhone 14
Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm) vs iPhone 14
Samsung SM-A066E/DS Galaxy A06 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA 64GB (Samsung A066) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Xiaomi Redmi A4 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116RNC1I (Xiaomi Warm) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.