Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R): Which One Should You Buy?
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 69.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M)
Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)7280
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatterySamsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M)8670
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) has the bigger screen6.7" vs 6.66"
- Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) is lighter187 g vs 200 g
- Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) wins — BeastScore 69.4/100
After comparing all the specs, Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 69.4 vs top rival 68.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 69.4 vs top rival 68.2 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more)
More system memory: 8GB RAM vs max 6GB · Lighter body: 187g (13g lighter in hand)
Common questions
Which is better: Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) or Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)?
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) leads with an overall BeastScore of 69.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) (68.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 69.4 vs top rival 68.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) and Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)?
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) has a 6.66-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) has a 6.7-inch display and 4000 mAh battery.
How do Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) and Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) compare for speed?
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) scores 72/100 for performance; Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
iPhone 14 Plus
Pixel 6a
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN CPH2381 (BBK 2381)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)
BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
Oppo Reno6 Lite 2022 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB CPH2365 (BBK 2219)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) vs Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) vs Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) vs iPhone 14 Plus
Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) vs Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) vs Pixel 6a
Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN CPH2381 (BBK 2381)
Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R) vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)
Related articles
All articles →
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →