vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G vs vivo iQOO Z10x 5G: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2025

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2025

vivo iQOO Z10x 5G

vivo iQOO Z10x 5G
87/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G wins 2 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G
vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G
2 wins
vivo iQOO Z10x 5G
vivo iQOO Z10x 5G
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5Gvivo iQOO Z10x 5G
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • Speedvivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G
    95
    86
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    95
    95
  • DisplayTie
    89
    89
  • Connectivityvivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G
    75
    65
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G has the bigger battery7,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh
  • vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G has the bigger screen6.78" vs 6.72"
  • vivo iQOO Z10x 5G is lighter204 g vs 206 g
  • vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G has newer Bluetooth6 vs 5.4
  • vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G has the faster chipSnapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Dimensity 7300
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G
  • ✓Bigger 7,000 mAh battery (+500 mAh)
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO Z10x 5G
  • ✓2 g lighter (204 g), easier to hold
  • ✓6.72" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5Gvivo iQOO Z10x 5G
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeAMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 2000 nits (HBM), 4400 nits (peak)IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (HBM)
Screen Size6.78"6.72"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8s Gen 4 Dimensity 7300
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 15Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 vivo iQOO Z10x 5G Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight206 g204 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity7,000 mAh6,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band
Bluetooth6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 55.4, A2DP, LE
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G wins — BeastScore 89.3/100

After comparing all the specs, vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 86.6 and Larger battery capacity: 7,000 mAh (+500 mAh more).

Buy vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 86.6 · Larger battery capacity: 7,000 mAh (+500 mAh more)

Buy vivo iQOO Z10x 5G if you want

Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support

Common questions

Which is better: vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G or vivo iQOO Z10x 5G?

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.3/100 compared to vivo iQOO Z10x 5G (86.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 86.6 and Larger battery capacity: 7,000 mAh (+500 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G and vivo iQOO Z10x 5G?

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G has a 6.78-inch display and 7000 mAh battery. vivo iQOO Z10x 5G has a 6.72-inch display and 6500 mAh battery.

How do vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G and vivo iQOO Z10x 5G compare for speed?

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro 5G scores 95/100 for performance; vivo iQOO Z10x 5G scores 86/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →