vivo iQOO Z6 (China) vs vivo Y200 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo iQOO Z6 (China) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.9/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2022

vivo iQOO Z6 (China)

vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
83/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2024

vivo Y200 Pro

vivo Y200 Pro
83/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

vivo Y200 Pro wins 2 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
1 win
vivo Y200 Pro
vivo Y200 Pro
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
vivo iQOO Z6 (China)vivo Y200 Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • Speedvivo iQOO Z6 (China)
    86
    79
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • Batteryvivo Y200 Pro
    80
    86
  • Displayvivo Y200 Pro
    84
    89
  • ConnectivityTie
    55
    55
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • vivo Y200 Pro has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
  • vivo Y200 Pro has the bigger screen6.78" vs 6.64"
  • vivo Y200 Pro is lighter172 g vs 185 g
  • vivo iQOO Z6 (China) has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
  • ✓6.64" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo Y200 Pro
  • ✓13 g lighter (172 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+500 mAh)
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo iQOO Z6 (China)vivo Y200 Pro
1. Display & Screen🏆 vivo Y200 Pro Wins Display
Screen typeIPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED
Screen Size6.64"6.78"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (388 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 vivo iQOO Z6 (China) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 778G+ 5G Snapdragon 695 5G
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 12Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256 GB128 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 vivo Y200 Pro Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight185 g172 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP54
8. Battery & Charging🏆 vivo Y200 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,500 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectNot listed
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LEv5.1
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGYes
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

vivo iQOO Z6 (China) wins — BeastScore 82.9/100

After comparing all the specs, vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 82.9 vs top rival 82.8 and More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 8GB.

Buy vivo iQOO Z6 (China) if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 82.9 vs top rival 82.8 · More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 8GB

Buy vivo Y200 Pro if you want

Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+500 mAh more) · Significantly faster wired charging: 44W vs max 0W

Common questions

Which is better: vivo iQOO Z6 (China) or vivo Y200 Pro?

vivo iQOO Z6 (China) leads with an overall BeastScore of 82.9/100 compared to vivo Y200 Pro (82.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 82.9 vs top rival 82.8 and More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 8GB.

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo iQOO Z6 (China) and vivo Y200 Pro?

vivo iQOO Z6 (China) has a 6.64-inch display and 4500 mAh battery. vivo Y200 Pro has a 6.78-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do vivo iQOO Z6 (China) and vivo Y200 Pro compare for speed?

vivo iQOO Z6 (China) scores 86/100 for performance; vivo Y200 Pro scores 79/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →