vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance vs vivo iQOO Z9x: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2025

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2024

vivo iQOO Z9x

vivo iQOO Z9x
87/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance wins 2 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
2 wins
vivo iQOO Z9x
vivo iQOO Z9x
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurancevivo iQOO Z9x
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • Speedvivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
    95
    86
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    95
    95
  • DisplayTie
    89
    89
  • Connectivityvivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
    65
    55
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance has the bigger battery6,400 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance has the bigger screen6.78" vs 6.72"
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance is lighter196 g vs 199 g
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance has the faster chipSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
  • ✓3 g lighter (196 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 6,400 mAh battery (+400 mAh)
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO Z9x
  • ✓6.72" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurancevivo iQOO Z9x
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeAMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDRIPS LCD
Screen Size6.78"6.72"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (393 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 15Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512 GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight196 g199 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP64
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity6,400 mAh6,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-bandNot listed
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Losslessv5.1
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance wins — BeastScore 89.3/100

After comparing all the specs, vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 86.6 and Larger battery capacity: 6,400 mAh (+400 mAh more).

Buy vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 86.6 · Larger battery capacity: 6,400 mAh (+400 mAh more)

Buy vivo iQOO Z9x if you want

Significantly faster wired charging: 44W vs max 0W

Common questions

Which is better: vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance or vivo iQOO Z9x?

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.3/100 compared to vivo iQOO Z9x (86.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 86.6 and Larger battery capacity: 6,400 mAh (+400 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance and vivo iQOO Z9x?

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance has a 6.78-inch display and 6400 mAh battery. vivo iQOO Z9x has a 6.72-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.

How do vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance and vivo iQOO Z9x compare for speed?

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance scores 95/100 for performance; vivo iQOO Z9x scores 86/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →