BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/vivo V29e vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Lab Benchmark Battle

vivo V29e vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across โ‡„
Vivo

vivo V29e

vivo V29e
83/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
83/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS vivo V29e BETTER THAN Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

vivo V29eWinner ๐Ÿ†
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORvivo V29eXiaomi BlackLEADER
Refresh Rate120Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity4,800 mAh6,600 mAh+6,600 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor50 MP50 MP50 MP
Screen Display Size6.67"10.1"10.1"
Chassis WeightN/AN/A999g

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across โ‡„
Reasons to buy vivo V29e:
  • โœ“50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • โœ“6.67" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE:
  • โœ“Larger 6,600 mAh battery capacity (+1,800 mAh more capacity)
  • โœ“50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • โœ“10.1" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across โ‡„
Specificationvivo V29eXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
1. Display & Screen๐Ÿ† Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.67"10.1"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance๐Ÿ† vivo V29e Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 695 5G Helio G85
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256 GB128 GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics๐Ÿ† vivo V29e Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, Triple Camera System50 MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens12 MP12 MP
7. Body & Dimensions๐Ÿ† vivo V29e Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
WeightN/AN/A
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging๐Ÿ† Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,800 mAh6,600 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

vivo V29e edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.9/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, vivo V29e ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose vivo V29e:
Higher overall BeastScore: 82.9 vs top rival 82.6 ยท More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 6GB
When to choose Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE:
Larger battery capacity: 6,600 mAh (+1,800 mAh more) ยท Significantly larger display: 10.1" vs max 6.67" for media & multitasking
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: vivo V29e vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

Which is better: vivo V29e or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

vivo V29e leads with an overall BeastScore of 82.9/100 compared to Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE (82.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 82.9 vs top rival 82.6 and More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 6GB.

What are the primary battery and display differences between vivo V29e and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

vivo V29e is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 4800 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE features a 10.1-inch display and 6600 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between vivo V29e and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

In objective hardware benchmarks, vivo V29e achieves a 86/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE scores 70/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News โ†’
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read Analysis โ†’
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read Analysis โ†’
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis โ†’