BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/vivo X200 vs Vivo X300
Lab Benchmark Battle

vivo X200 vs Vivo X300

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Vivo · 2024

vivo X200

vivo X200
89/ 100
Launch MSRP$849 USD
Vivo · 2025

Vivo X300

Vivo X300
90/ 100
Launch MSRP$749 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Vivo X300 BETTER THAN vivo X200?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

vivo X200
Vivo X300Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORvivo X200Vivo X300LEADER
Refresh Rate120Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity5,800 mAh6,040 mAh+6,040 mAh
Wired Fast Charging90W90W90W
Main Camera Sensor50 MP50 MP50 MP
Screen Display Size6.67"6.31"6.67"
Chassis Weight199g190g190g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo X200:
  • ✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓6.67" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Vivo X300:
  • ✓9g lighter chassis (190g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓$100 lower launch MSRP ($749 vs $849)
  • ✓Larger 6,040 mAh battery capacity (+240 mAh more capacity)

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
Specificationvivo X200Vivo X300
1. Display & Screen🏆 vivo X200 Wins Display
Screen Type & TechLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Screen Size6.67"6.31"
Resolution & Density2800x1260 (460 ppi)2640x1216 (460 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
Brightness4,500 nits peak4,500 nits peak
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 vivo X200 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid 15Android 16
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB256GB / 512GB / 1024GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 vivo X200 Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.57, OIS, Sony LYT-81850 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-828
Telephoto Zoom50 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.57, OIS200 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.7, OIS
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/250 MP, f/2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/250 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Vivo X300 Lightest Chassis
Dimensions162.9 x 76.7 x 7.99 mm150.9 x 71.9 x 7.95 mm
Weight199 g190 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceIP68IP69
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Vivo X300 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,800 mAh6,040 mAh
Wired Fast Charging90W wired fast charging90W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging30W wireless charging40W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch Price$849$749
Editorial Lab Verdict

Vivo X300 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.6/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Vivo X300 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose vivo X200:
Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
When to choose Vivo X300:
Higher overall BeastScore: 89.6 vs top rival 88.8 · Larger battery capacity: 6,040 mAh (+240 mAh more)
Upgrade GuideOwn the vivo X200? See if upgrading to the Vivo X300 is worth it
Read the Verdict →
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: vivo X200 vs Vivo X300

Which is better: vivo X200 or Vivo X300?

Vivo X300 leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.6/100 compared to vivo X200 (88.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 89.6 vs top rival 88.8 and Larger battery capacity: 6,040 mAh (+240 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between vivo X200 and Vivo X300?

vivo X200 is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 5800 mAh battery, while Vivo X300 features a 6.31-inch display and 6040 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between vivo X200 and Vivo X300?

In objective hardware benchmarks, vivo X200 achieves a 90/100 performance score, while Vivo X300 scores 90/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read Analysis →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read Analysis →