BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Vivo X300 Pro vs Vivo X300s
Lab Benchmark Battle

Vivo X300 Pro vs Vivo X300s

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Vivo · 2025

Vivo X300 Pro

Vivo X300 Pro
90/ 100
Launch MSRP$999 USD
Vivo · 2026

Vivo X300s

Vivo X300s
93/ 100
Launch MSRP$799 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Vivo X300s BETTER THAN Vivo X300 Pro?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo X300sWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORVivo X300Vivo X300sLEADER
Refresh Rate120Hz144Hz144Hz
Battery Capacity6,510 mAh7,100 mAh+7,100 mAh
Wired Fast Charging90W90W90W
Main Camera Sensor50 MP200 MP200 MP
Screen Display Size6.78"6.78"6.78"
Chassis Weight226g218g218g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Vivo X300 Pro:
  • ✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓6.78" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Vivo X300s:
  • ✓8g lighter chassis (218g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓$200 lower launch MSRP ($799 vs $999)
  • ✓Larger 7,100 mAh battery capacity (+590 mAh more capacity)

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationVivo X300 ProVivo X300s
1. Display & Screen🏆 Vivo X300s Wins Display
Screen Type & TechLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Screen Size6.78"6.78"
Resolution & Density2800x1260 (460 ppi)2800x1260 (460 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion144 Hz ProMotion
Brightness4,500 nits peak4,500 nits peak
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Vivo X300 Pro Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid 16Android 16
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB / 1024GB256GB / 512GB / 1024GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Vivo X300s Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.6, OIS, Sony LYT-828200 MP, f/1.68, OIS, Samsung HPBr 1/1.4-inch
Telephoto Zoom200 MP (3.7x optical zoom), f/2.6, OIS50 MP (3.7x optical zoom), f/2.6, OIS
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/250 MP, f/2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens50 MP, f/250 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Vivo X300s Lightest Chassis
Dimensions162.1 x 75.6 x 7.99 mm162.5 x 76.3 x 8.2 mm
Weight226 g218 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceIP69IP69
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Vivo X300 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity6,510 mAh7,100 mAh
Wired Fast Charging90W wired fast charging90W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging40W wireless charging40W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.06.0
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch Price$999$799
Editorial Lab Verdict

Vivo X300s edges ahead with a BeastScore of 93.1/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Vivo X300s ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Vivo X300 Pro:
More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 12GB
When to choose Vivo X300s:
Higher overall BeastScore: 93.1 vs top rival 89.6 · Larger battery capacity: 7,100 mAh (+590 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Vivo X300 Pro vs Vivo X300s

Which is better: Vivo X300 Pro or Vivo X300s?

Vivo X300s leads with an overall BeastScore of 93.1/100 compared to Vivo X300 Pro (89.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 93.1 vs top rival 89.6 and Larger battery capacity: 7,100 mAh (+590 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Vivo X300 Pro and Vivo X300s?

Vivo X300 Pro is equipped with a 6.78-inch display and 6510 mAh battery, while Vivo X300s features a 6.78-inch display and 7100 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Vivo X300 Pro and Vivo X300s?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Vivo X300 Pro achieves a 95/100 performance score, while Vivo X300s scores 90/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read Analysis →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read Analysis →