BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Vivo X300s vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Lab Benchmark Battle

Vivo X300s vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Vivo · 2026

Vivo X300s

Vivo X300s
93/ 100
Launch MSRP$799 USD
Xiaomi · 2023

Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Redmi Note 13 Pro+
91/ 100
Launch MSRP$399 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Vivo X300s BETTER THAN Redmi Note 13 Pro+?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Vivo X300sWinner 🏆
Redmi Note 13 Pro+

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORVivo X300sRedmi NoteLEADER
Refresh Rate144Hz120Hz144Hz
Battery Capacity7,100 mAh5,000 mAh+7,100 mAh
Wired Fast Charging90W120W120W Max
Main Camera Sensor200 MP200 MP200 MP
Screen Display Size6.78"6.67"6.78"
Chassis Weight218g204.5g204.5g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Vivo X300s:
  • ✓Larger 7,100 mAh battery capacity (+2,100 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓200MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓6.78" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Redmi Note 13 Pro+:
  • ✓13.5g lighter chassis (204.5g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓$400 lower launch MSRP ($399 vs $799)
  • ✓200MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationVivo X300sRedmi Note 13 Pro+
1. Display & Screen🏆 Vivo X300s Wins Display
Screen Type & TechLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.78"6.67"
Resolution & Density2800x1260 (460 ppi)2712x1220 (446 ppi)
Refresh Rate144 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
Brightness4,500 nits peak1,800 nits peak
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Vivo X300s Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid 16Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB / 1024GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Vivo X300s Wins Camera
Primary Camera200 MP, f/1.68, OIS, Samsung HPBr 1/1.4-inch200 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Samsung HP3
Telephoto Zoom50 MP (3.7x optical zoom), f/2.6, OISNone (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/28 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens50 MP, f/216 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Redmi Note 13 Pro+ Lightest Chassis
Dimensions162.5 x 76.3 x 8.2 mm161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm
Weight218 g204.5 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceIP69IP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Vivo X300s Wins Battery
Battery Capacity7,100 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging90W wired fast charging120W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging40W wireless chargingNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth6.05.3
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch Price$799$399
Editorial Lab Verdict

Vivo X300s edges ahead with a BeastScore of 93.1/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Vivo X300s ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Vivo X300s:
Higher overall BeastScore: 93.1 vs top rival 90.8 · Larger battery capacity: 7,100 mAh (+2,100 mAh more)
When to choose Redmi Note 13 Pro+:
Significantly faster wired charging: 120W vs max 90W · Lighter body: 204.5g (14g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Vivo X300s vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Which is better: Vivo X300s or Redmi Note 13 Pro+?

Vivo X300s leads with an overall BeastScore of 93.1/100 compared to Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (90.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 93.1 vs top rival 90.8 and Larger battery capacity: 7,100 mAh (+2,100 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Vivo X300s and Redmi Note 13 Pro+?

Vivo X300s is equipped with a 6.78-inch display and 7100 mAh battery, while Redmi Note 13 Pro+ features a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Vivo X300s and Redmi Note 13 Pro+?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Vivo X300s achieves a 90/100 performance score, while Redmi Note 13 Pro+ scores 90/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read Analysis →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis →