BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/vivo Y200 Pro vs Xiaomi 13
Lab Benchmark Battle

vivo Y200 Pro vs Xiaomi 13

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across โ‡„
Vivo

vivo Y200 Pro

vivo Y200 Pro
83/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Xiaomi ยท 2023

Xiaomi 13

Xiaomi 13
83/ 100
Launch MSRP$899 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Xiaomi 13 BETTER THAN vivo Y200 Pro?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

vivo Y200 Pro
Xiaomi 13Winner ๐Ÿ†

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORvivo Y200Xiaomi 13LEADER
Refresh Rate120Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh4,500 mAh+5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandard67W67W Max
Main Camera Sensor50 MP50 MP50 MP
Screen Display Size6.78"6.36"6.78"
Chassis WeightN/A185g185g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across โ‡„
Reasons to buy vivo Y200 Pro:
  • โœ“Larger 5,000 mAh battery capacity (+500 mAh more capacity)
  • โœ“50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • โœ“6.78" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Xiaomi 13:
  • โœ“814g lighter chassis (185g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • โœ“$9100 lower launch MSRP ($899 vs $9999)
  • โœ“50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across โ‡„
Specificationvivo Y200 ProXiaomi 13
1. Display & Screen๐Ÿ† vivo Y200 Pro Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.78"6.36"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED 2400x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A1,900 nits peak
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance๐Ÿ† Xiaomi 13 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 695 5G High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128 GB128GB / 256GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics๐Ÿ† Xiaomi 13 Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, Triple Camera System50 MP, f/1.8, OIS, Sony IMX800
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)10 MP (3x optical zoom), f/3.5, OIS
Ultrawide CameraN/A12 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens12 MP32 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions๐Ÿ† Xiaomi 13 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A152.8 x 71.5 x 7.98 mm
WeightN/A185 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedIP68
8. Battery & Charging๐Ÿ† vivo Y200 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh4,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast charging67W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot supported50W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+5.3
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on request$899
Editorial Lab Verdict

Xiaomi 13 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 83.1/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Xiaomi 13 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose vivo Y200 Pro:
Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+500 mAh more)
When to choose Xiaomi 13:
Higher overall BeastScore: 83.1 vs top rival 82.8 ยท Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 0W
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: vivo Y200 Pro vs Xiaomi 13

Which is better: vivo Y200 Pro or Xiaomi 13?

Xiaomi 13 leads with an overall BeastScore of 83.1/100 compared to vivo Y200 Pro (82.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 83.1 vs top rival 82.8 and Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 0W.

What are the primary battery and display differences between vivo Y200 Pro and Xiaomi 13?

vivo Y200 Pro is equipped with a 6.78-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Xiaomi 13 features a 6.36-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between vivo Y200 Pro and Xiaomi 13?

In objective hardware benchmarks, vivo Y200 Pro achieves a 79/100 performance score, while Xiaomi 13 scores 80/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News โ†’
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read Analysis โ†’
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read Analysis โ†’
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis โ†’