vivo Y300 (China) vs vivo Y300t 5G: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo Y300 (China) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.6/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2024

vivo Y300 (China)

vivo Y300 (China)
87/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2025

vivo Y300t 5G

vivo Y300t 5G
87/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

vivo Y300 (China) wins 0 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo Y300 (China)
vivo Y300 (China)
0 wins
vivo Y300t 5G
vivo Y300t 5G
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
vivo Y300 (China)vivo Y300t 5G
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    86
    86
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    95
    95
  • DisplayTie
    89
    89
  • ConnectivityTie
    65
    65
  • SecurityTie
    34
    34
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger screen6.77" vs 6.72"
  • vivo Y300 (China) is lighter200 g vs 204 g
  • vivo Y300t 5G has the faster chipDimensity 7300 vs Dimensity 6300
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo Y300 (China)
  • ✓4 g lighter (200 g), easier to hold
  • ✓6.77" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo Y300t 5G
  • ✓6.72" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo Y300 (China)vivo Y300t 5G
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeAMOLEDIPS LCD
Screen Size6.77"6.72"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (388 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (393 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorDimensity 6300 Dimensity 7300
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 15Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 vivo Y300 (China) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight200 g204 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP64IP64
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity6,500 mAh6,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
Bluetoothv5.4v5.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

vivo Y300 (China) wins — BeastScore 86.6/100

After comparing all the specs, vivo Y300 (China) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.

Buy vivo Y300 (China) if you want

Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support

Buy vivo Y300t 5G if you want

Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support

Common questions

Which is better: vivo Y300 (China) or vivo Y300t 5G?

vivo Y300 (China) leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.6/100 compared to vivo Y300t 5G (86.6/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo Y300 (China) and vivo Y300t 5G?

vivo Y300 (China) has a 6.77-inch display and 6500 mAh battery. vivo Y300t 5G has a 6.72-inch display and 6500 mAh battery.

How do vivo Y300 (China) and vivo Y300t 5G compare for speed?

vivo Y300 (China) scores 86/100 for performance; vivo Y300t 5G scores 86/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →