BeastCompare

vivo Y300i vs vivo Y300 GT 5G: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo Y300i edges ahead with a BeastScore of 87.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2025

vivo Y300i

vivo Y300i
87/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2025

vivo Y300 GT 5G

vivo Y300 GT 5G
87/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

vivo Y300 GT 5G wins 2 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo Y300i
vivo Y300i
1 win
vivo Y300 GT 5G
vivo Y300 GT 5G
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
vivo Y300ivivo Y300 GT 5G
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • Speedvivo Y300i
    91
    86
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    95
    95
  • Displayvivo Y300 GT 5G
    84
    89
  • Connectivityvivo Y300 GT 5G
    40
    65
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • vivo Y300 GT 5G has the bigger battery7,620 mAh vs 6,500 mAh
  • vivo Y300 GT 5G has the bigger screen6.78" vs 6.68"
  • vivo Y300i is lighter205 g vs 212 g
  • vivo Y300 GT 5G has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 4.2
  • vivo Y300 GT 5G has the faster chipDimensity 8400 vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo Y300i
  • ✓7 g lighter (205 g), easier to hold
  • ✓6.68" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo Y300 GT 5G
  • ✓Bigger 7,620 mAh battery (+1,120 mAh)
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo Y300ivivo Y300 GT 5G
1. Display & Screen🏆 vivo Y300 GT 5G Wins Display
Screen typeIPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED
Screen Size6.68"6.78"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (453 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 vivo Y300i Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 4 Gen 2 Dimensity 8400
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 15Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 vivo Y300i Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight205 g212 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP65
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity6,500 mAh7,620 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandNot listed
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, aptX Adaptivev5.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

vivo Y300i wins — BeastScore 87.4/100

After comparing all the specs, vivo Y300i is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 87.4 vs top rival 86.6.

Buy vivo Y300i if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 87.4 vs top rival 86.6

Buy vivo Y300 GT 5G if you want

Larger battery capacity: 7,620 mAh (+1,120 mAh more) · Significantly faster wired charging: 90W vs max 0W

Common questions

Which is better: vivo Y300i or vivo Y300 GT 5G?

vivo Y300i leads with an overall BeastScore of 87.4/100 compared to vivo Y300 GT 5G (86.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 87.4 vs top rival 86.6.

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo Y300i and vivo Y300 GT 5G?

vivo Y300i has a 6.68-inch display and 6500 mAh battery. vivo Y300 GT 5G has a 6.78-inch display and 7620 mAh battery.

How do vivo Y300i and vivo Y300 GT 5G compare for speed?

vivo Y300i scores 91/100 for performance; vivo Y300 GT 5G scores 86/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+

Apple iPad Air 13 5G (2026)
Apple

Apple iPad Air 13 5G (2026)

Pixel 10 Pro XL
Google

Pixel 10 Pro XL

OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro 5G
Oneplus

OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G

vivo iQOO 15T 5G
Vivo

vivo iQOO 15T 5G

Oppo Pad Mini
Oppo

Oppo Pad Mini

Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 50 Pro

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

vivo Y200i vs vivo Y300i

Compare →
vs

vivo Y300t 5G vs vivo Y300i

Compare →
vs

vivo Y300 Pro+ vs vivo Y300i

Compare →
vs

vivo Y300i vs vivo Y300 (China)

Compare →
vs

vivo Y300i vs vivo Y300 Plus

Compare →
vs

Y200 GT vs vivo Y300 GT 5G

Compare →
vs

vivo Y300t 5G vs vivo Y300 GT 5G

Compare →
vs

vivo Y300 Pro+ vs vivo Y300 GT 5G

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →