Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) vs Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa): Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 69.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) wins 0 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie8080
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie7878
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa) has the bigger battery4,820 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
- Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa) has the bigger screen6.73" vs 6.67"
- Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) is lighter220 g vs 229 g
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) wins — BeastScore 69.8/100
After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Significantly faster wired charging: 120W vs max 0W and Smoother display: 144Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz.
Significantly faster wired charging: 120W vs max 0W · Smoother display: 144Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz
Larger battery capacity: 4,820 mAh (+320 mAh more)
Common questions
Which is better: Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) or Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa)?
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) leads with an overall BeastScore of 69.8/100 compared to Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa) (69.8/100), driven by advantages in Significantly faster wired charging: 120W vs max 0W and Smoother display: 144Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz.
What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) and Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa)?
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) has a 6.67-inch display and 4500 mAh battery. Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa) has a 6.73-inch display and 4820 mAh battery.
How do Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) and Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa) compare for speed?
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Pixel 6a

OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB IV2201 (BBK Ivan)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 21121210G (Xiaomi Ingres)

BBK Vivo X90s 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2241HA (BBK V2241HA)

Oppo Reno8 T 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 BD KH 128GB CPH2505 (BBK 2505)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa) vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) vs Pixel 6a
Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa) vs Pixel 6a
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB IV2201 (BBK Ivan)
Xiaomi Mi 13 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 2210132C (Xiaomi Nuwa) vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB IV2201 (BBK Ivan)
Related articles
All articles →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Flagship GPU ArchitectureNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs. RTX 5080 Blackwell Architecture Deep Dive: GB202 vs GB203 Silicon, 32GB GDDR7, DLSS 4 Neural Rendering, and Definitive 4K Ray Tracing Benchmarks
An exhaustive silicon, GDDR7 memory subsystem, neural rendering, local AI LLM inferencing, and 4K path-tracing analysis comparing NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell graphics cards.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →