Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro BETTER THAN Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Xiaomi Poco | Xiaomi Poco | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh | +6,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.67" | 6.67" | 6.67" |
| Chassis Weight | 209g | N/A | 209g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across โXiaomi Poco F7 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 88.6/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Which is better: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) or Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro?
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro leads with an overall BeastScore of 88.6/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) (75.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 88.6 vs top rival 75.2 and Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) and Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro?
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro features a 6.67-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) and Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) achieves a 95/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro scores 95/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
More Smartphones Battles
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 5G
POCO F5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P)
POCO F6 vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G
POCO F5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx) vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Hardware PickExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?
ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.








