vivo iQOO Z11 5G (China)

Key Specifications (Android)
See Full Specs ▶vivo iQOO Z11 5G (China) Full Specifications
12 Comprehensive Categories| 1. Display & Screen | |
| Display Type | AMOLED |
| Screen Size | 6.83" |
| Resolution & Density | FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| Brightness | N/A |
| Screen Protection | Scratch-resistant glass |
| 2. Platform & Performance | |
| Processor / Chipset | Dimensity 8500 |
| CPU | Multi-core architecture |
| GPU | Integrated Graphics |
| Operating System | Android |
| 3. Memory & Storage | |
| RAM | 16 GB LPDDR |
| Internal Storage | 512 GB |
| Storage Speed | High-speed storage |
| 4. Cameras & Optics | |
| Main Camera | 50 MP, Triple Camera System |
| Telephoto Zoom | None (Digital zoom only) |
| Ultrawide Camera | N/A |
| LiDAR / Depth | None |
| Selfie Camera | 12 MP |
| 5. Battery & Fast Charging | |
| Battery Capacity | 9,020 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Fast charging |
| Wireless Charging | No |
| 6. Body, Build & Resistance | |
| Dimensions | Standard dimensions |
| Weight | N/A |
| Build Materials | Glass front, metal/glass frame |
| Water & Dust Resistance | Not certified |
| 7. Connectivity & Ports | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 / 6E |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3+ |
| USB | USB Type-C |
| NFC | Yes |
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+

Apple iPad Air 11 5G (2026)
Pixel 7 Pro

OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G

vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra 5G

Oppo Pad 6

Motorola Edge 70 Max 5G
Popular Head-to-Head Battles for vivo iQOO Z11 5G (China)
vivo iQOO Z11 5G (China) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+


vivo iQOO Z11 5G (China) vs Apple iPad Air 11 5G (2026)


vivo iQOO Z11 5G (China) vs Pixel 7 Pro

vivo iQOO Z11 5G (China) vs OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro 5G


vivo iQOO Z11 5G (China) vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G


vivo iQOO Z11 5G (China) vs vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra 5G


vivo iQOO Z11 5G (China) vs Oppo Pad 6


vivo iQOO Z11 5G (China) vs Motorola Edge 70 Max 5G


Related Technology Articles & Insights
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Flagship Projector ShootoutHisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.
Prosumer NAS Flagship ShootoutUGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)
We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.