A16e 2022 Premium Edition vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736): Which One Should You Buy?
A16e 2022 Premium Edition edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.2/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
A16e 2022 Premium Edition
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
A16e 2022 Premium Edition wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)6472
- CameraA16e 2022 Premium Edition6860
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie7070
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- A16e 2022 Premium Edition has the bigger battery4,230 mAh vs 4,050 mAh
- Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) has the bigger screen6.58" vs 6.52"
- A16e 2022 Premium Edition is lighter175 g vs 240 g
- Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) has more RAM6 GB vs 4 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄A16e 2022 Premium Edition wins — BeastScore 66.2/100
After comparing all the specs, A16e 2022 Premium Edition is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher resolution main sensor: 13 MP vs max 0 MP and Lighter body: 175g (65g lighter in hand).
Higher resolution main sensor: 13 MP vs max 0 MP · Lighter body: 175g (65g lighter in hand)
More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 4GB
Common questions
Which is better: A16e 2022 Premium Edition or Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
A16e 2022 Premium Edition leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.2/100 compared to Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) (66.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher resolution main sensor: 13 MP vs max 0 MP and Lighter body: 175g (65g lighter in hand).
What are the main battery and display differences between A16e 2022 Premium Edition and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
A16e 2022 Premium Edition has a 6.52-inch display and 4230 mAh battery. Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) has a 6.58-inch display and 4050 mAh battery.
How do A16e 2022 Premium Edition and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) compare for speed?
A16e 2022 Premium Edition scores 64/100 for performance; Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) scores 72/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
BBK Vivo Y02s 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 EMEA 32GB V2203 (BBK V2203)
A17k
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
A16e 2022 Premium Edition vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
A16e 2022 Premium Edition vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
A16e 2022 Premium Edition vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
A16e 2022 Premium Edition vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related articles
All articles →
Hardware PickExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?
ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.
Read →
CameraOppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate
Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.
Read →
Lab Tested · Monitor Architecture ShowdownASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)
We benchmarked the top 32-inch 4K 240Hz OLED gaming monitors across Gen 3 QD-OLED color volume, LG Micro Lens Array (MLA+) WOLED dual-mode 480Hz switching, sub-pixel text fringing, thermal dissipation heatsinks, DisplayPort 1.4 DSC vs HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, and 3-year burn-in warranties.
Read →