Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) vs Mi Pad 7.9: Which One Should You Buy?
Mi Pad 7.9 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 68.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Mi Pad 7.9 wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedApple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)9060
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryMi Pad 7.95896
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Mi Pad 7.9 has the bigger battery6,700 mAh vs 3,149 mAh
- Mi Pad 7.9 has the bigger screen7.9" vs 6.55"
- Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) is lighter165 g vs 360 g
- Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) has more RAM12 GB vs 2 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Mi Pad 7.9 wins — BeastScore 68.4/100
After comparing all the specs, Mi Pad 7.9 is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 68.4 vs top rival 68.3 and Larger battery capacity: 6,700 mAh (+3,551 mAh more).
More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 2GB · Lighter body: 165g (195g lighter in hand)
Higher overall BeastScore: 68.4 vs top rival 68.3 · Larger battery capacity: 6,700 mAh (+3,551 mAh more)
Common questions
Which is better: Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) or Mi Pad 7.9?
Mi Pad 7.9 leads with an overall BeastScore of 68.4/100 compared to Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) (68.3/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 68.4 vs top rival 68.3 and Larger battery capacity: 6,700 mAh (+3,551 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) and Mi Pad 7.9?
Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) has a 6.55-inch display and 3149 mAh battery. Mi Pad 7.9 has a 7.9-inch display and 6700 mAh battery.
How do Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) and Mi Pad 7.9 compare for speed?
Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) scores 90/100 for performance; Mi Pad 7.9 scores 60/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)

OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)

Oppo Reno 7 A 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 128GB A201OP (BBK 2353)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)
Mi Pad 7.9 vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)
Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) vs Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)
Mi Pad 7.9 vs Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)
Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Mi Pad 7.9 vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4) vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)
Mi Pad 7.9 vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)
Related articles
All articles →
Deep DiveSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner
We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.
Read →
BenchmarkHere are the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max Geekbench scores
First verified Geekbench 6 results show Apple's 2nm A20 Pro achieving 3,924 single-core and 10,876 multi-core scores, establishing a decisive computing lead.
Read →
MarketTrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026
TrendForce forecasts Apple will capture 25.2% of worldwide foldable smartphone shipments in 2026 following the iPhone Duo release, reshaping competition with Samsung.
Read →