BeastCompare

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs Mi Pad 7.9: Which One Should You Buy?

Mi Pad 7.9 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 68.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Google · 2023

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
68/ 100
Launch price$499
Xiaomi · 2014

Mi Pad 7.9

Mi Pad 7.9
68/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) wins 3 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
3 wins
Mi Pad 7.9
Mi Pad 7.9
1 win
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)Mi Pad 7.9
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGoogle Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
    80
    60
  • CameraTie
    60
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieGoogle Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
    60
    40
  • BatteryMi Pad 7.9
    70
    96
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityGoogle Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
    90
    40
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    68
    68
Key differences
  • Mi Pad 7.9 has the bigger battery6,700 mAh vs 4,385 mAh
  • Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) has a sharper main camera64 MP vs 8 MP
  • Mi Pad 7.9 has the bigger screen7.9" vs 6.1"
  • Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) is lighter193.5 g vs 360 g
  • Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) has a sharper selfie camera13 MP vs 5 MP
  • Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 4
  • Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) has more RAM8 GB vs 2 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
  • ✓166.5 g lighter (193.5 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$9500 cheaper at launch ($499 vs $9999)
  • ✓64 MP main camera
Reasons to buy Mi Pad 7.9
  • ✓Bigger 6,700 mAh battery (+2,315 mAh)
  • ✓8 MP main camera
  • ✓7.9" display

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGoogle Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)Mi Pad 7.9
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeAM-OLED displayIPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
Screen Size6.1"7.9"
Resolution & Density1080x2400 (431 ppi)1536x2048 (324 ppi)
Refresh Rate90 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
Brightness1,000 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorGoogle Tensor G2 (5nm)Not listed
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsMali-G710 MP7Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 13Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR2 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB2GB / 64GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Camera64 MP, f/1.89, OIS, Samsung GN18 MP
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera13 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens13 MP, f/2.25 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) Lightest Chassis
Dimensions152.4 x 72.9 x 9 mmN/A
Weight193.5 g360 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP67Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Mi Pad 7.9 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,385 mAh6,700 mAh
Wired Fast Charging18W wired fast chargingN/A
Wireless Charging7W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot
Bluetooth5.34.0, A2DP
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2microUSB 2.0, USB Host
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$499Price on request
Our verdict

Mi Pad 7.9 wins — BeastScore 68.4/100

After comparing all the specs, Mi Pad 7.9 is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 68.4 vs top rival 68.2 and Larger battery capacity: 6,700 mAh (+2,315 mAh more).

Buy Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) if you want

Significantly faster wired charging: 18W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 64 MP vs max 8 MP

Buy Mi Pad 7.9 if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 68.4 vs top rival 68.2 · Larger battery capacity: 6,700 mAh (+2,315 mAh more)

Common questions

Which is better: Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) or Mi Pad 7.9?

Mi Pad 7.9 leads with an overall BeastScore of 68.4/100 compared to Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) (68.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 68.4 vs top rival 68.2 and Larger battery capacity: 6,700 mAh (+2,315 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) and Mi Pad 7.9?

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) has a 6.1-inch display and 4385 mAh battery. Mi Pad 7.9 has a 7.9-inch display and 6700 mAh battery.

How do Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) and Mi Pad 7.9 compare for speed?

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) scores 80/100 for performance; Mi Pad 7.9 scores 60/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)
Samsung

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)
Apple

Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)

Pixel 6a
Google

Pixel 6a

OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)

Oppo Reno 7 A 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 128GB A201OP (BBK 2353)
Oppo

Oppo Reno 7 A 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 128GB A201OP (BBK 2353)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

Compare →
vs

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

Compare →
vs

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)

Compare →
vs

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)

Compare →
vs

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs Pixel 6a

Compare →
vs

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Pixel 6a

Compare →
vs

Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)

Compare →
vs

Mi Pad 7.9 vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" Deep Dive: 16 Zen 5 Cores, 40-CU RDNA 3.5, 128GB Unified Memory, and Local LLM ArchitectureHARDWARE DEEP DIVE
14 min read

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" Deep Dive: 16 Zen 5 Cores, 40-CU RDNA 3.5, 128GB Unified Memory, and Local LLM Architecture

A complete architectural breakdown of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Strix Halo): 16 full Zen 5 cores, Radeon 8060S with 40 RDNA 3.5 compute units, 128GB unified LPDDR5X-8533 memory, 32MB MALL cache, and local AI benchmarks.

Read →
Apple M4 Max & M4 Pro Silicon Deep Dive: 3nm Architecture, 128GB Unified Memory, Thunderbolt 5, and Benchmark BreakdownSilicon Deep Dive
14 min read

Apple M4 Max & M4 Pro Silicon Deep Dive: 3nm Architecture, 128GB Unified Memory, Thunderbolt 5, and Benchmark Breakdown

An architectural deep dive into Apple's M4 Pro and M4 Max silicon: 2nd-gen 3nm lithography, 546 GB/s memory bandwidth, 2x ray-tracing throughput, Thunderbolt 5, and real-world benchmarks across LLMs, 3D rendering, and video production.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →